CAJ | 학술논문

长期以来,在有关民事责任承担的理论中,民事行为能力决定民事责任能力这种错误的学说处于支配性地位,并以此指导我国的民事立法,导致我国《侵权责任法》第32条关于被监护人侵权责任的规定存在严重的缺陷。民事责任能力与行为能力无关。相反,民事权利能力才是民事责任能力的源泉,民事权利能力与民事责任的承担资格存在必然的逻辑应对关系。唯有如此,才能构建合理的被监护人侵权责任制度。
장기이래,재유관민사책임승담적이론중,민사행위능력결정민사책임능력저충착오적학설처우지배성지위,병이차지도아국적민사입법,도치아국《침권책임법》제32조관우피감호인침권책임적규정존재엄중적결함。민사책임능력여행위능력무관。상반,민사권리능력재시민사책임능력적원천,민사권리능력여민사책임적승담자격존재필연적라집응대관계。유유여차,재능구건합리적피감호인침권책임제도。
In the past years,in the theory of undertaking civil liability,wrong doctrine of capacity for civil conduct determining civil liability is in the dominant position and guides our country＇s civil legislation.This results in serious flaws in our country＇s ＂Tort Liability Act＂ Article 32 on the tort liability provisions of the ward.The capacity for civil liability has nothing to do with the capacity for civil conduct.In contrast,capacity for civil right is the source of capacity for civil liability,and undertaking civil liability exists in a natural logical relationship.Only in this way,can we build a reasonable system of tort liability of the ward.