北京体育大学学报
北京體育大學學報
북경체육대학학보
Journal of Beijing University of Physical Education
2010年
5期
59~61
,共null页
知名篮球鞋 耐克全掌气垫篮球鞋 安踏非气垫篮球鞋 力学性能
知名籃毬鞋 耐剋全掌氣墊籃毬鞋 安踏非氣墊籃毬鞋 力學性能
지명람구혜 내극전장기점람구혜 안답비기점람구혜 역학성능
well-known basketball shoes; full-palm-air basketball shoes of Nike; non-air basketball shoes of Anta; mechanical properties
目的：了解国内外二款知名篮球鞋＂耐克＂全掌气垫篮球鞋和＂安踏＂非气垫篮球鞋的力学性能,评价力学功效。方法：以实验法测试二款知名篮球鞋的力学性能。结果：二款知名篮球鞋的压力测试表明,几乎所有的被试者＂鞋-地＂界面平均压力与峰值压力＂安踏＂鞋比＂耐克＂鞋稍高,但二款篮球鞋＂鞋-地＂界面的平均压力与峰值压力值都不存在显著性差异（P〉0.05）;纵跳实验表明,＂安踏＂鞋纵跳高度稍高于＂耐克＂鞋,二者之间并无统计学上的差异;摩擦系数实验表明,＂耐克＂鞋的动静摩擦系数优于＂安踏＂鞋的动静摩擦系数,二者的的动静摩擦系数之间存在统计学上的差异（P〈0.05）。
目的：瞭解國內外二款知名籃毬鞋＂耐剋＂全掌氣墊籃毬鞋和＂安踏＂非氣墊籃毬鞋的力學性能,評價力學功效。方法：以實驗法測試二款知名籃毬鞋的力學性能。結果：二款知名籃毬鞋的壓力測試錶明,幾乎所有的被試者＂鞋-地＂界麵平均壓力與峰值壓力＂安踏＂鞋比＂耐剋＂鞋稍高,但二款籃毬鞋＂鞋-地＂界麵的平均壓力與峰值壓力值都不存在顯著性差異（P〉0.05）;縱跳實驗錶明,＂安踏＂鞋縱跳高度稍高于＂耐剋＂鞋,二者之間併無統計學上的差異;摩抆繫數實驗錶明,＂耐剋＂鞋的動靜摩抆繫數優于＂安踏＂鞋的動靜摩抆繫數,二者的的動靜摩抆繫數之間存在統計學上的差異（P〈0.05）。
목적：료해국내외이관지명람구혜＂내극＂전장기점람구혜화＂안답＂비기점람구혜적역학성능,평개역학공효。방법：이실험법측시이관지명람구혜적역학성능。결과：이관지명람구혜적압력측시표명,궤호소유적피시자＂혜-지＂계면평균압력여봉치압력＂안답＂혜비＂내극＂혜초고,단이관람구혜＂혜-지＂계면적평균압력여봉치압력치도불존재현저성차이（P〉0.05）;종도실험표명,＂안답＂혜종도고도초고우＂내극＂혜,이자지간병무통계학상적차이;마찰계수실험표명,＂내극＂혜적동정마찰계수우우＂안답＂혜적동정마찰계수,이자적적동정마찰계수지간존재통계학상적차이（P〈0.05）。
The purpose of this study was to explore mechanical properties and evaluate mechanical effect of the well-known foreign full-palm-air basketball shoes of the Nike and domestic non-air basketball shoes of Anta.The method is to conduct experiment on the mechanical properties of these shoes.The stress tests show that,almost all mean pressure and peak pressure of Anta was slightly higher than Nike on ＂shoes-ground＂indicators,but the average pressure and peak pressure value does not exist significant differences（P0.05）.The vertical jump tests show that the height of vertical jump of Anta was slightly higher than the Nike but without significant difference.The friction coefficient tests show that dynamic or static friction coefficient of Nike is superior than Anta,and the dynamic or static friction coefficient does exist significant differences（P0.05）.
