CAJ | 학술논문

作为一种司法理念或司法方式,中国的能动司法与西方司法能动主义既有知识上的缘脉关系,也有现象上的同质性,但由于各国政治及司法制度的不同,两者亦有一定区别,总体上应将中国能动司法视为世界法治语境中司法能动主义的一种特殊形态。西方司法能动主义是以司法独立性较强、全社会规则化意识较为明确、法官职业化制度较为成熟为基本条件的,因此,对于国情差异较大的中国来说,能动司法在实践形态上对西方司法能动主义应既有保留,又有创新和发展,同时应从多方面建立相应的保障机制,亦即：宏观上,建立良性的司法与政治的互动机制;中观上,建立有效的最高司法机构指导机制;微观上,建立合理而有序的法院内部审判运行机制。
작위일충사법이념혹사법방식,중국적능동사법여서방사법능동주의기유지식상적연맥관계,야유현상상적동질성,단유우각국정치급사법제도적불동,량자역유일정구별,총체상응장중국능동사법시위세계법치어경중사법능동주의적일충특수형태。서방사법능동주의시이사법독립성교강、전사회규칙화의식교위명학、법관직업화제도교위성숙위기본조건적,인차,대우국정차이교대적중국래설,능동사법재실천형태상대서방사법능동주의응기유보류,우유창신화발전,동시응종다방면건립상응적보장궤제,역즉：굉관상,건립량성적사법여정치적호동궤제;중관상,건립유효적최고사법궤구지도궤제;미관상,건립합리이유서적법원내부심판운행궤제。
As a judicial notion and practice,the Chinese style judicial activism has a theoretical link withthe Western style judicial activism and has as well presented some similar features as a phenomenon.Nevertheless,owing to the different political and judicial systems in different states,the Chinese style judicial activism and Western style judicial activism is somehow different.In general,the Chinese style judicial activismshould be viewed as an unique form in the context of the worldwide rule by law milieu.The Western style judicial activism is coupled with judicial independence,a more eager pursuit for the explicit rules of social behaviors and a more mature professional judiciary.Therefore,different Chinese circumstances call for a restrainedjudicial activism with a different model in practice.Meanwhile,renovation and development is required andthe corresponding safeguarding mechanism needs to be established：firstly,a harmoniously interactive relationbetween judiciary and politics should be sought;secondly,a mechanism should be set up for the effective supervision conducted by the highest judicial body over the lower courts;thirdly,an effective and orderly internal judicial adjudicating mechanism should be established.