CAJ | 학술논문

欧美学刊发表的大部分有关西藏人权的文章，往往荒谬地虚构出一些根本不成立的逻辑起点，其在研究过程中第一手资料的获取方法也极不规范，论证范式常常自相矛盾，文章的结论更是荒谬、错误，反映出作者学术之外的另有企图。在这些文章中，除了有些作者本身即是对中国历来就怀有敌意的组织的顾问或成员之外，亦有相当数量是出自那些初出茅庐的法律硕士和博士生，他们大都是流亡海外、得到一些欧美大学资助攻读学位的第二代和第三代藏族人。对于这些人，既要与其针锋相对，同时还应鼓励他们回来看看。西藏已发生翻天覆地的变化，西藏人权研究不能只在猜想中进行。
구미학간발표적대부분유관서장인권적문장，왕왕황류지허구출일사근본불성립적라집기점，기재연구과정중제일수자료적획취방법야겁불규범，론증범식상상자상모순，문장적결론경시황류、착오，반영출작자학술지외적령유기도。재저사문장중，제료유사작자본신즉시대중국력래취부유활의적조직적고문혹성원지외，역유상당수량시출자나사초출모려적법률석사화박사생，타문대도시류망해외、득도일사구미대학자조공독학위적제이대화제삼대장족인。대우저사인，기요여기침봉상대，동시환응고려타문회래간간。서장이발생번천복지적변화，서장인권연구불능지재시상중진행。
Most articles published by European and American Journals on Tibet＇s human rights issue often absurdly make up some invalid fabrications as logical starting points. In the process of research, the methods to obtain first- hand information are irregular as well as the arguments are often contradictory paradigm. As a result, the conclusions of these articles are usually absurd and incorrect which reflecting the authors may have other intentions besides the academic research. In these articles, some authors are consultants or members from the hostile organizations against China. Moreover, a number of them are LL.M. and Ph. D. students with Grants from Law Schools of European Universities who are the second-generation or third generation of Tibetans in exile, For these people, we should not only oppose their wrong viewpoints with tit for tat but also encourage them to return hack to see the dramastic changes taken place in Tibet.