改革
改革
개혁
Reform
2010年
9期
98~106
,共null页
煤电关系 长期契约 市场价格契约 市场价格基准 契约治理机制
煤電關繫 長期契約 市場價格契約 市場價格基準 契約治理機製
매전관계 장기계약 시장개격계약 시장개격기준 계약치리궤제
coal-electricity relationship, long-term contract, market price contract, benchmark for market price, contract governance machanism
煤炭企业、电力企业和政府三方围绕电煤价格的争执与博弈持续不断。在交易成本理论和契约理论的框架下，通过中美两国的比较，对中国煤电纵向交易方式进行权衡与选择。研究表明：同美国一样，中国的煤电纵向交易关系应以长期契约机制为主；与美国不同，中国电煤长期契约应以市场价格调整机制为主，以降低履约风险。
煤炭企業、電力企業和政府三方圍繞電煤價格的爭執與博弈持續不斷。在交易成本理論和契約理論的框架下，通過中美兩國的比較，對中國煤電縱嚮交易方式進行權衡與選擇。研究錶明：同美國一樣，中國的煤電縱嚮交易關繫應以長期契約機製為主；與美國不同，中國電煤長期契約應以市場價格調整機製為主，以降低履約風險。
매탄기업、전력기업화정부삼방위요전매개격적쟁집여박혁지속불단。재교역성본이론화계약이론적광가하，통과중미량국적비교，대중국매전종향교역방식진행권형여선택。연구표명：동미국일양，중국적매전종향교역관계응이장기계약궤제위주；여미국불동，중국전매장기계약응이시장개격조정궤제위주，이강저리약풍험。
The conflict among coal enterprises, electric power enterprises and the government on the price has been lasting for a long time. Within the framework of the theory of transaction cost and contract theory, this paper makes tradeoffs and choices on the vertical transaction relations of coal and electricity enterprises through the comparison between China and U. S.. The research shows that like U.S., China should make long-term contract machanism as its major vertical transaction re- lations for coal and electricity enterprises, while different from U.S., the long-term contract in China should be based on ad- justment mechanism of market price in order to let the performance risk of the contract down.
