心理学报
心理學報
심이학보
Acta Psychologica Sinica
2010年
10期
970~980
,共null页
视网膜离心率 反向掩蔽 注意梯度 同步判断 抑制梯度
視網膜離心率 反嚮掩蔽 註意梯度 同步判斷 抑製梯度
시망막리심솔 반향엄폐 주의제도 동보판단 억제제도
retinal eccentricity; metacontrast masking; excitation gradient; simultaneous judgment; inhibition gradient
采用同步判断(Simultaneous judgment,SJ)的研究范式探讨空间注意梯度是否受到视网膜离心率的影响。实验中给被试呈现两个目标刺激,调节它们的呈现距离和间隔时间,让被试进行不限时的同步判断,计算出各种距离上的主观等同点(Point of Subjective Simultaneous,PSS)变化情况。实验中对比了注视点和注意点重合与分离的两种状态。其中注视点和注意点分离的状态是指使用反向掩蔽后的线索刺激将注意点内隐地引导到外周。通过控制似动等影响因素,发现在注意点和注视点分离的状态下存在距离效应--也就是随着距离的增长主观等同点变化越大,但是在重合的状态下则没有。结果表明分离状态下存在传统意义上的注意梯度效应,而重合时,注意易化梯度受到一个抑制梯度的影响。这说明,注意梯度分布受到视网膜离心率的影响,而影响方式符合注意点为中心的易化梯度场和注视点为中心的抑制梯度场的双梯度场理论。
採用同步判斷(Simultaneous judgment,SJ)的研究範式探討空間註意梯度是否受到視網膜離心率的影響。實驗中給被試呈現兩箇目標刺激,調節它們的呈現距離和間隔時間,讓被試進行不限時的同步判斷,計算齣各種距離上的主觀等同點(Point of Subjective Simultaneous,PSS)變化情況。實驗中對比瞭註視點和註意點重閤與分離的兩種狀態。其中註視點和註意點分離的狀態是指使用反嚮掩蔽後的線索刺激將註意點內隱地引導到外週。通過控製似動等影響因素,髮現在註意點和註視點分離的狀態下存在距離效應--也就是隨著距離的增長主觀等同點變化越大,但是在重閤的狀態下則沒有。結果錶明分離狀態下存在傳統意義上的註意梯度效應,而重閤時,註意易化梯度受到一箇抑製梯度的影響。這說明,註意梯度分佈受到視網膜離心率的影響,而影響方式符閤註意點為中心的易化梯度場和註視點為中心的抑製梯度場的雙梯度場理論。
채용동보판단(Simultaneous judgment,SJ)적연구범식탐토공간주의제도시부수도시망막리심솔적영향。실험중급피시정현량개목표자격,조절타문적정현거리화간격시간,양피시진행불한시적동보판단,계산출각충거리상적주관등동점(Point of Subjective Simultaneous,PSS)변화정황。실험중대비료주시점화주의점중합여분리적량충상태。기중주시점화주의점분리적상태시지사용반향엄폐후적선색자격장주의점내은지인도도외주。통과공제사동등영향인소,발현재주의점화주시점분리적상태하존재거리효응--야취시수착거리적증장주관등동점변화월대,단시재중합적상태하칙몰유。결과표명분리상태하존재전통의의상적주의제도효응,이중합시,주의역화제도수도일개억제제도적영향。저설명,주의제도분포수도시망막리심솔적영향,이영향방식부합주의점위중심적역화제도장화주시점위중심적억제제도장적쌍제도장이론。
The distribution of spatial attention in visual field has been one of the most interesting topics in visual studies. However to date it remains controversial due to different paradigms used and many confounding factors involved. One such factor, the retinal eccentricity, can potentially spatial attention but has been largely overlook in previous reports. In the current study we aimed to investigate whether and how retinal eccentricity affects gradient distribution of visual spatial attention using Scharlau’s paradigm. In Experiment 1, the participants were presented with two target stimuli with different stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), and were asked to make untimed simultaneous judgment (SJ). Two target stimuli were separated at 6.4° or 3.2° distribution of retina. In addition, two conditions were set for the fixation point and attentional point, including an overlapping condition where two points overlapped and a separate condition where the attentional point was covertly pulled away from the fixation point by a peripheral exogenous cue. To avoid occurrence of response bias, the cue was backward-masked by the following target. The points of subjective simultaneous (PSS) across each conditions and distances were compared. The results showed that only PSS in the separate condition with long distances apartment between two points was significantly different with 0 ms. In order to prevent apparent movement which might confound the results of Experiment 1, the two target stimuli were assigned different topological structures in the Experiment 2, which confirmed that there was no significant difference of the subjective brightness between two stimuli. A follow-up study Experiment 3 replicated the procedure of Experiment 1 with the following modifications: the two target stimuli were topologically different; the contrast degree was reduced; and four dots were converged to the center cross before each trial to ensure the subjects focused their attentions on the center. The result showed that a distance effect was found only under the overlapping condition but not the separate condition, indicating that the gradient distribution of visual spatial attention was affected by retinal eccentricity. To sum up, the present study demonstrates that retinal eccentricity affects the gradient distribution of visual attention. Current findings also provide further evidences to support the "two attentional gradients theory" which argues for an inhibition gradient centered at the fixation point and an excitation gradient centered at the cued location in the visual field.