CAJ | 학술논문

本文对目的语环境中的韩国留学生与中国中学生中文阅读学习策略进行了调查,结果表明：（1）阅读中文时,两国学生最常用的是推测策略和语境策略,最不常用的是母语策略和互动策略。在阅读观念上差异不显著,在管理策略和母语、预览和略读等阅读学习策略的使用上差异极其显著。韩国学生更多地使用语境和标记策略,中国学生更多地使用选材、母语、略读、预览和推测策略。（2）韩国学生的预览策略对其学习成绩具有预测力,而文本观念和互动策略对其学习成绩具有轻微的负预测力。对中国学生来说,推测策略对其学习成绩具有预测力。
본문대목적어배경중적한국류학생여중국중학생중문열독학습책략진행료조사,결과표명：（1）열독중문시,량국학생최상용적시추측책략화어경책략,최불상용적시모어책략화호동책략。재열독관념상차이불현저,재관리책략화모어、예람화약독등열독학습책략적사용상차이겁기현저。한국학생경다지사용어경화표기책략,중국학생경다지사용선재、모어、약독、예람화추측책략。（2）한국학생적예람책략대기학습성적구유예측력,이문본관념화호동책략대기학습성적구유경미적부예측력。대중국학생래설,추측책략대기학습성적구유예측력。
This paper investigates Chinese reading strategies used by Korean students and Chinese middle school students in target language environment.The major findings are as follows：（1） For the students of both countries,the most commonly used Chinese reading strategies are inferencing strategy and context strategy,while the least commonly used are L1 strategy and interactive strategy.In the concept of reading,no significant difference is observed between the students of the two countries,though there are extremely significant differences in their management strategy and use of the learning strategies,such as,L1 strategy,previewing and skimming.Compared with Chinese students who are more inclined to use selection,L1 strategy,skimming,previewing and inferencing strategy in their reading,Korean students,show a high preference to apply the strategy of context and markedness.（2） There is a positive correlation between Korean students＇ previewing strategy and their academic achievement,but the belief in bottom-up strategy and interactive strategy may affect their academic achievement in a slightly negative way.For Chinese students,there is a positive correlation between the inferencing strategy and their academic achievement.