CAJ | 학술논문

原告在前诉就争议法律关系提起部分请求后,剩余请求是否允许在后诉中提起,不同学说在新旧诉讼标的理论中都能得到自圆其说,但却有纯理论循环论证之虞。文章从价值考量的角度,对部分请求权的肯定说和否定说进行了分析,尝试提出了关于部分请求权的妥当性思考。
원고재전소취쟁의법률관계제기부분청구후,잉여청구시부윤허재후소중제기,불동학설재신구소송표적이론중도능득도자원기설,단각유순이론순배론증지우。문장종개치고량적각도,대부분청구권적긍정설화부정설진행료분석,상시제출료관우부분청구권적타당성사고。
After the plaintiff in the former complaint made part request in the legal relation dispute,whether the Remaining request is allowed to be put forward,different theory can not make its statement consistent in the theory of the old and new subject matter of litigation,but all the theories seem to be the pure circular argument.From the perspective of the value of consideration,the paper analysis the positive and negative theory of the part request,and try to put forward the proper thinking of the part request.