CAJ | 학술논문

以往学者大多认为中国社会制度背后的组织通则为亲族原则，并形成了“差序格局”的社会特征，从而造成了中国低信任度文化的产生，不利于中国的发展。但通过历史分析和博弈推演可知：由于与印度、欧洲的起始博弈不同，中国人建立了基于同情心原则的人格化信任方式——直接信任，这一信任方式虽然在真实性、范围和强度上都优于其他信任方式，但由于辅助的非人格化信任的周期性解体与重建，以及近代社会的转型和外部威胁，中国人的直接信任方式具有不稳定的特点。所以说，中国人对不同对象给予信任的不同顺序与强度是因安全原因才逐渐表现出来的，中国社会的“差序格局”特征更多的是时间顺序上的，并从时间顺序反映到空间范围上。
이왕학자대다인위중국사회제도배후적조직통칙위친족원칙，병형성료“차서격국”적사회특정，종이조성료중국저신임도문화적산생，불리우중국적발전。단통과역사분석화박혁추연가지：유우여인도、구주적기시박혁불동，중국인건립료기우동정심원칙적인격화신임방식——직접신임，저일신임방식수연재진실성、범위화강도상도우우기타신임방식，단유우보조적비인격화신임적주기성해체여중건，이급근대사회적전형화외부위협，중국인적직접신임방식구유불은정적특점。소이설，중국인대불동대상급여신임적불동순서여강도시인안전원인재축점표현출래적，중국사회적“차서격국”특정경다적시시간순서상적，병종시간순서반영도공간범위상。
Many scholars used to think that the general principle of social organization behind China＇s social system was the kinship principle, which formed the social characteristic of ＂differential pattern＂. This characteristic resulted in a Chinese culture of low credibility, thus impeding the development of China. But through historical analysis and game deduction, it is observed that since China differs in the origin of game theory from India and Europe the Chinese build ＂direct trust＂, a trust mode based on the principle of sympathy. Although this mode is superior to others in terms of reality, scope and strength, the direct trust carries with it a degree of liability as a result of the periodic disintegration and reconstruction of auxiliary impersonal trust as well as the transition and external threat of modern society. Therefore, the pattern of Chinese people＇s trust given to different objects varying in order and intensity gradually manifests itself with the changes of the security circumstances in China. The social characteristic of ＂differential pattern＂ in China is mainly concerned with the time relation and its subsequent expansion into a space relation.