心理发展与教育
心理髮展與教育
심리발전여교육
Psychological Development and Education
2011年
1期
44~51
,共null页
杨颖 邹泓 余益兵 许志星
楊穎 鄒泓 餘益兵 許誌星
양영 추홍 여익병 허지성
社会问题解决能力 社会适应 中学生
社會問題解決能力 社會適應 中學生
사회문제해결능력 사회괄응 중학생
social problem solving ability; social adaption; adolescent
采用问卷法,对2157名中学生社会问题解决能力的特点及其与社会适应的关系进行研究。结果发现:(1)从初中到高中,中学生的社会问题解决能力出现下降的趋势;男生在计划制定上显著高于女生,在人际沟通、支持寻求上显著低于女生;班干部的社会问题解决能力显著高于非班干部;(2)中学生的社会问题解决能力可分为建设型、一般型和不良型,所占比例分别为22.9%、42.8%、34.4%,建设型中学生的社会适应状况显著好于一般型和不良型;(3)社会问题解决能力与社会适应状况显著相关,其对积极的社会适应有显著的正向预测作用,对消极的社会适应有显著的负向预测作用;在社会问题解决能力各维度中,问题趋近和问题回避的预测作用最为突出。
採用問捲法,對2157名中學生社會問題解決能力的特點及其與社會適應的關繫進行研究。結果髮現:(1)從初中到高中,中學生的社會問題解決能力齣現下降的趨勢;男生在計劃製定上顯著高于女生,在人際溝通、支持尋求上顯著低于女生;班榦部的社會問題解決能力顯著高于非班榦部;(2)中學生的社會問題解決能力可分為建設型、一般型和不良型,所佔比例分彆為22.9%、42.8%、34.4%,建設型中學生的社會適應狀況顯著好于一般型和不良型;(3)社會問題解決能力與社會適應狀況顯著相關,其對積極的社會適應有顯著的正嚮預測作用,對消極的社會適應有顯著的負嚮預測作用;在社會問題解決能力各維度中,問題趨近和問題迴避的預測作用最為突齣。
채용문권법,대2157명중학생사회문제해결능력적특점급기여사회괄응적관계진행연구。결과발현:(1)종초중도고중,중학생적사회문제해결능력출현하강적추세;남생재계화제정상현저고우녀생,재인제구통、지지심구상현저저우녀생;반간부적사회문제해결능력현저고우비반간부;(2)중학생적사회문제해결능력가분위건설형、일반형화불량형,소점비례분별위22.9%、42.8%、34.4%,건설형중학생적사회괄응상황현저호우일반형화불량형;(3)사회문제해결능력여사회괄응상황현저상관,기대적겁적사회괄응유현저적정향예측작용,대소겁적사회괄응유현저적부향예측작용;재사회문제해결능력각유도중,문제추근화문제회피적예측작용최위돌출。
A sample of 2,157 students participated in current study. Questionnaires were used to investigate the characteristics of adolescents' social problem solving ability and its relationship with social adaption. The results indicated that : ( 1 ) adolescents' social problem solving ability decreased from junior middle school to high school. Boys' scores were significantly higher than girls' in plan making, but lower in interpersonal communications and support seeking. Moreover, the social problem solving ability of student leaders was significantly better than the other students. (2) adolescents' social problem solving ability can be categorized into three groups: constructive group, ordinary group, and weak group, whose proportion were 22.9% , 42.8% , and 34.4% , respectively. And the constructive group' s scores were significantly higher than the others. ( 3 ) the social problem solving ability positively predicted active social adaption, and negatively predicted negative social adaption. Problem approaching and problem avoidance were two key predictors among the dimensions of social problem solving ability.