厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版
廈門大學學報:哲學社會科學版
하문대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Xiamen University(A Quarterly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
2011年
1期
134~140
,共null页
安克斯密特 历史表现 语言转向 叙述实体
安剋斯密特 歷史錶現 語言轉嚮 敘述實體
안극사밀특 역사표현 어언전향 서술실체
Ankersmit, historical representation, linguistic turn, narrative entity
围绕“历史表现”这一核心概念,安克斯密特对史学叙述文本进行了深入的论述与分析。其观点要义,是强调文本在语义上并非其中所包含的具有明确指称的陈述语句的逻辑总和,因此,历史叙述不是过去的摹仿镜象,而是历史实在由之被形塑、建构,其意义得以澄明的语言文本。在此基础上,安氏明确提出从表现的观点看待史学文本的理论主张,强调关于历史事实的真实陈述是史学文本的起点而非终点,历史叙述更深刻的内涵乃在于为我们理解历史提供更多、更宽广的视角和更独特的理解样式。安克斯密特从历史哲学出发,在本体论高度上探讨了语言与存在的关系,揭示出史学与美学的内在会通之处。但是,在诸如句子与文本的联系以及史学表现与艺术表现的关系等问题上,其观点和论证尚有未尽之处,这为今后进一步的探讨留下了理论空间。
圍繞“歷史錶現”這一覈心概唸,安剋斯密特對史學敘述文本進行瞭深入的論述與分析。其觀點要義,是彊調文本在語義上併非其中所包含的具有明確指稱的陳述語句的邏輯總和,因此,歷史敘述不是過去的摹倣鏡象,而是歷史實在由之被形塑、建構,其意義得以澄明的語言文本。在此基礎上,安氏明確提齣從錶現的觀點看待史學文本的理論主張,彊調關于歷史事實的真實陳述是史學文本的起點而非終點,歷史敘述更深刻的內涵迺在于為我們理解歷史提供更多、更寬廣的視角和更獨特的理解樣式。安剋斯密特從歷史哲學齣髮,在本體論高度上探討瞭語言與存在的關繫,揭示齣史學與美學的內在會通之處。但是,在諸如句子與文本的聯繫以及史學錶現與藝術錶現的關繫等問題上,其觀點和論證尚有未儘之處,這為今後進一步的探討留下瞭理論空間。
위요“역사표현”저일핵심개념,안극사밀특대사학서술문본진행료심입적논술여분석。기관점요의,시강조문본재어의상병비기중소포함적구유명학지칭적진술어구적라집총화,인차,역사서술불시과거적모방경상,이시역사실재유지피형소、건구,기의의득이징명적어언문본。재차기출상,안씨명학제출종표현적관점간대사학문본적이론주장,강조관우역사사실적진실진술시사학문본적기점이비종점,역사서술경심각적내함내재우위아문리해역사제공경다、경관엄적시각화경독특적리해양식。안극사밀특종역사철학출발,재본체론고도상탐토료어언여존재적관계,게시출사학여미학적내재회통지처。단시,재제여구자여문본적련계이급사학표현여예술표현적관계등문제상,기관점화론증상유미진지처,저위금후진일보적탐토류하료이론공간。
F. Ankersmit expounded and analyzed in depth texts of historical narratives focusing on the key concept of "historical representation". His assertion is that semantically a text is not the logic total of the statements with explicit references that make up the text and therefore that historical narratives are not mirrors of the past but linguistic products in which historical realities are shaped and constructed and their meanings are clarified. Then, Ankersmit went on to propose his representational perspective on historical texts emphasizing that true statements about historical realities are the begin- ning rather than the end of historical texts. The deeper meaning of historical narratives lies in the fact that they provide us with interpretational paradigms with a greater variety, broader perspectives and more unique characteristics. Ankersmit explored the relations between language and existence on an ontological level and from the perspective of historical philosophy and shed light on the inherent convergence of history and esthetics. However, his arguments and theorizations about relevance of sentences to texts and relations between historical representation and artistic representation are not without problems. This means that there is still room for more theoretical exploration in his theory..