心理学报
心理學報
심이학보
Acta Psychologica Sinica
2011年
2期
123~131
,共null页
汉语 句法 大脑左侧额叶 功能性磁共振成像
漢語 句法 大腦左側額葉 功能性磁共振成像
한어 구법 대뇌좌측액협 공능성자공진성상
Mandarin Chinese; syntactic; left frontal brain area; functional magnetic resonance imaging
大脑中的句法加工模式是神经认知科学研究的重要课题,而句法加工是否存在独立性一直是研究者争论较多的问题。有形态标记的英语等印欧语语言的句法可以通过形态变化表现,而汉语不具备与印欧语有明确对应关系的形态变化,因此汉语的句法变化几乎不能通过外在形态标记。通过3T场强功能性磁共振成像,以汉语语义等值使动句为研究材料,对不依赖形态变化来标记句法变化的汉语句法加工的独立性进行了初步研究。结果显示,大脑左侧额叶对于汉语句法加工具有重要的作用,尤其是大脑左侧额叶中回的BA44区和额叶下回的BA47区都对汉语句法加工较为敏感,这表明即使不通过形态改变来标记句法变化,汉语句子加工中的句法加工仍然可以被分离,句法独立性的加工主要由大脑左侧额叶中回及大脑左侧额叶下回等脑区承担,大脑左侧颞叶并未参与汉语句法的独立性加工。
大腦中的句法加工模式是神經認知科學研究的重要課題,而句法加工是否存在獨立性一直是研究者爭論較多的問題。有形態標記的英語等印歐語語言的句法可以通過形態變化錶現,而漢語不具備與印歐語有明確對應關繫的形態變化,因此漢語的句法變化幾乎不能通過外在形態標記。通過3T場彊功能性磁共振成像,以漢語語義等值使動句為研究材料,對不依賴形態變化來標記句法變化的漢語句法加工的獨立性進行瞭初步研究。結果顯示,大腦左側額葉對于漢語句法加工具有重要的作用,尤其是大腦左側額葉中迴的BA44區和額葉下迴的BA47區都對漢語句法加工較為敏感,這錶明即使不通過形態改變來標記句法變化,漢語句子加工中的句法加工仍然可以被分離,句法獨立性的加工主要由大腦左側額葉中迴及大腦左側額葉下迴等腦區承擔,大腦左側顳葉併未參與漢語句法的獨立性加工。
대뇌중적구법가공모식시신경인지과학연구적중요과제,이구법가공시부존재독립성일직시연구자쟁론교다적문제。유형태표기적영어등인구어어언적구법가이통과형태변화표현,이한어불구비여인구어유명학대응관계적형태변화,인차한어적구법변화궤호불능통과외재형태표기。통과3T장강공능성자공진성상,이한어어의등치사동구위연구재료,대불의뢰형태변화래표기구법변화적한어구법가공적독립성진행료초보연구。결과현시,대뇌좌측액협대우한어구법가공구유중요적작용,우기시대뇌좌측액협중회적BA44구화액협하회적BA47구도대한어구법가공교위민감,저표명즉사불통과형태개변래표기구법변화,한어구자가공중적구법가공잉연가이피분리,구법독립성적가공주요유대뇌좌측액협중회급대뇌좌측액협하회등뇌구승담,대뇌좌측섭협병미삼여한어구법적독립성가공。
The brain processing models of syntactic and semantics are important issues in the cognitive neurosciences. In 1957, Noam Chomsky put forward the framework of Syntax Independence. Even today, the hypothesis of Syntax Independence is one of the central topics of linguistics. However, this important language hypothesis has not been well studied by neuroscience researchers. Boland (1997), Grodzinsky et al. (2008) and other researchers showed evidence of syntactic independence, and even proposed specific brain regions involved in independent syntactic processing. However, these studies have been challenged by some other researchers (e.g.,Willems Hagoort 2009). In fact, there are many morphological and syntactic markers in English and other Indo-European languages, and the syntactic variations in these languages can be embodied by morphological changes. In contrast, a language like Chinese does not have clear correspondent morphological changes like the Indo-European languages do. Consequently, if in the current experiment we can get at the neural processing of a morphologically impoverished languages like Chinese, we can find more conclusive evidence for the hypothesis of Syntax Independence in the brain. The materials in this study are two types of Chinese Causative Sentences with an equivalent meaning. For example, (1) Shichang Shi Jingji Fanrong (DCS);(2) Shichang Fanrong Le Jingji (RCS). These two sentences have the same meaning "The market made the economy prosperous" in Chinese. The sentence (1) is termed Dominant Causative Sentences (DCS) and the (2) is termed Recessive Causative Sentences (RCS). The fMRI acquisistion was done on a GE 3.0T machine with an event-related design. The participants were 19 healthy, right-handed, native Chinese speakers, 10 males and 9 females, with ages ranging from 20 to 26 years. The experimental data was analyzed with the AFNI software package. Images were spatial normalized to the Talairach and Tournoux brain atlas and smoothed with a FWHM=5mm kernel and eliminate the linear drift. The average impulse response function of the different conditions were obtained in an ANOVA analysis. The results showed that the left inferior frontal gyrus, the left middle frontal gyrus, and some other gyus in the left and right hemisphere were activated in the processing of Chinese Causative sentences. Further analysis showed that the left frontal lobe plays an important role in Chinese syntactic processing. The left inferior frontal lobe areas BA44 and BA47 are more sensitive to the Chinese syntactic processing when comparing the brain activations of DCS and RCS with a corrected p value 0.05. These results indicate that Chinese syntactic processing without morphological changes can be separated from semantics. The processing of syntactic independence is more closely related with the left inferior frontal gyrus than the left middle frontal gyrus, and the temporal lobe is not found in Chinese syntactic independence processing.