北方法学
北方法學
북방법학
NORTHERN LEGAL SCIENCE
2011年
1期
126~134
,共null页
清末诉讼 律师 讼师
清末訴訟 律師 訟師
청말소송 률사 송사
lawsuits in the Late Qing; lawyers; litigation masters
在清末立法改革的背景下,《大清刑事民事诉讼法草案》作为第一部正式明确规定律师制度的草案而备受争议,虽然这部草案因为种种原因未能实施,但却成为近代中国律师制度的起点。如何将封建法时代的讼师平稳转化为近代的律师是一个横跨实体法和程序法的交叉领域,也会出现正式的官方制度和非正式的民间制度之间的博弈。该草案关于律师制度的种种规定很大程度上借鉴了日本的经验,但却没有收到预期的效果。以沈家本为代表的立法者和以张之洞为代表的执行者之间围绕此草案产生巨大争议,其背后的实质在于此草案的内容与当时的社会现实之间存在巨大鸿沟。向日本学习立法经验不但需要借鉴它的成果,更重要的是需要了解它的过程和融会理解它的方式。
在清末立法改革的揹景下,《大清刑事民事訴訟法草案》作為第一部正式明確規定律師製度的草案而備受爭議,雖然這部草案因為種種原因未能實施,但卻成為近代中國律師製度的起點。如何將封建法時代的訟師平穩轉化為近代的律師是一箇橫跨實體法和程序法的交扠領域,也會齣現正式的官方製度和非正式的民間製度之間的博弈。該草案關于律師製度的種種規定很大程度上藉鑒瞭日本的經驗,但卻沒有收到預期的效果。以瀋傢本為代錶的立法者和以張之洞為代錶的執行者之間圍繞此草案產生巨大爭議,其揹後的實質在于此草案的內容與噹時的社會現實之間存在巨大鴻溝。嚮日本學習立法經驗不但需要藉鑒它的成果,更重要的是需要瞭解它的過程和融會理解它的方式。
재청말입법개혁적배경하,《대청형사민사소송법초안》작위제일부정식명학규정률사제도적초안이비수쟁의,수연저부초안인위충충원인미능실시,단각성위근대중국률사제도적기점。여하장봉건법시대적송사평은전화위근대적률사시일개횡과실체법화정서법적교차영역,야회출현정식적관방제도화비정식적민간제도지간적박혁。해초안관우률사제도적충충규정흔대정도상차감료일본적경험,단각몰유수도예기적효과。이침가본위대표적입법자화이장지동위대표적집행자지간위요차초안산생거대쟁의,기배후적실질재우차초안적내용여당시적사회현실지간존재거대홍구。향일본학습입법경험불단수요차감타적성과,경중요적시수요료해타적과정화융회리해타적방식。
During the legislative reform in the late Qing Dynasty,the Draft of Criminal and Civil Procedure Law in Qing Dynasty was the first official document to regulate the lawyer system,which aroused much controversy.Though the Draft failed to be implemented for some reason,it initiated the lawyer system in modern China.The smooth transformation from litigation masters of feudalism to modern lawyers involved both substantive and procedural law,as well as the game between formal official system and informal civic norms.This Draft took much experience from Japan but did work so well.Great controversies arose between Shen jia-ben who stood for legislation and Zhang zhi-dong who supported execution,which demonstrated the huge gap between the regulations and the social reality at that particular time.Thus,it is better to learn from Japan the process of integration than mere accomplishments.