心理科学
心理科學
심이과학
Psychological Science
2011年
1期
102~107
,共null页
心理弹性 压力/逆境敏感程度 觉知到的压力/逆境严重程度 觉知到的压力/逆境影响持久程度 觉知到的压力/逆境可应对程度
心理彈性 壓力/逆境敏感程度 覺知到的壓力/逆境嚴重程度 覺知到的壓力/逆境影響持久程度 覺知到的壓力/逆境可應對程度
심리탄성 압력/역경민감정도 각지도적압력/역경엄중정도 각지도적압력/역경영향지구정도 각지도적압력/역경가응대정도
Resilience; stresses/adversities perception; perceived stresses/adversities severity; perceived stresses/adversitias persistence; perceived stresses/adversity manageability
心理弹性儿童是如何看待其曾经历的或正在经历的严重压力/逆境的?解读这一问题或可促进对聚焦于儿童自身的心理弹性机制的探查。为考察心理弹性儿童压力/逆境认知特点,利用Visual FoxPro 8.0平台自编计算机程序和故事测验法,分别从压力/逆境的敏感程度、觉知到的压力/逆境严重程度、觉知到的压力/逆境影响持久程度和觉知到的压力/逆境可应对程度四个方面对心理弹性组儿童和缺乏心理弹性组儿童进行测量。结果发现:(1)心理弹性儿童的压力/逆境敏感程度高于缺乏心理弹性儿童,表现为前者在压力/逆境指标回忆量、压力/逆境再认敏感性指标和模糊情境下压力/逆境偏向性上的得分均比后者高,而且,前者的压力/逆境指标再认击中平均反应时比后者短,反应标准亦比后者宽松。(2)心理弹性儿童在觉知到的压力/逆境严重程度、影响持久程度和可应对程度上两亚类实验任务("你认为主人公如何看?"和"若你是主人公如何看?")上的得分与反应时,除设身处地的压力/逆境影响持久程度认知外,其余与缺乏心理弹性儿童之间差异均不显著,提示,心理弹性儿童所觉知到的严重压力/逆境影响远没有缺乏心理弹性儿童所认为的更为持久。文章探讨了儿童更为敏感的压力/逆境觉知和相对而言认为严重压力/逆境没有那么持久影响力之于心理弹性发展的意蕴。
心理彈性兒童是如何看待其曾經歷的或正在經歷的嚴重壓力/逆境的?解讀這一問題或可促進對聚焦于兒童自身的心理彈性機製的探查。為攷察心理彈性兒童壓力/逆境認知特點,利用Visual FoxPro 8.0平檯自編計算機程序和故事測驗法,分彆從壓力/逆境的敏感程度、覺知到的壓力/逆境嚴重程度、覺知到的壓力/逆境影響持久程度和覺知到的壓力/逆境可應對程度四箇方麵對心理彈性組兒童和缺乏心理彈性組兒童進行測量。結果髮現:(1)心理彈性兒童的壓力/逆境敏感程度高于缺乏心理彈性兒童,錶現為前者在壓力/逆境指標迴憶量、壓力/逆境再認敏感性指標和模糊情境下壓力/逆境偏嚮性上的得分均比後者高,而且,前者的壓力/逆境指標再認擊中平均反應時比後者短,反應標準亦比後者寬鬆。(2)心理彈性兒童在覺知到的壓力/逆境嚴重程度、影響持久程度和可應對程度上兩亞類實驗任務("妳認為主人公如何看?"和"若妳是主人公如何看?")上的得分與反應時,除設身處地的壓力/逆境影響持久程度認知外,其餘與缺乏心理彈性兒童之間差異均不顯著,提示,心理彈性兒童所覺知到的嚴重壓力/逆境影響遠沒有缺乏心理彈性兒童所認為的更為持久。文章探討瞭兒童更為敏感的壓力/逆境覺知和相對而言認為嚴重壓力/逆境沒有那麽持久影響力之于心理彈性髮展的意蘊。
심리탄성인동시여하간대기증경력적혹정재경력적엄중압력/역경적?해독저일문제혹가촉진대취초우인동자신적심리탄성궤제적탐사。위고찰심리탄성인동압력/역경인지특점,이용Visual FoxPro 8.0평태자편계산궤정서화고사측험법,분별종압력/역경적민감정도、각지도적압력/역경엄중정도、각지도적압력/역경영향지구정도화각지도적압력/역경가응대정도사개방면대심리탄성조인동화결핍심리탄성조인동진행측량。결과발현:(1)심리탄성인동적압력/역경민감정도고우결핍심리탄성인동,표현위전자재압력/역경지표회억량、압력/역경재인민감성지표화모호정경하압력/역경편향성상적득분균비후자고,이차,전자적압력/역경지표재인격중평균반응시비후자단,반응표준역비후자관송。(2)심리탄성인동재각지도적압력/역경엄중정도、영향지구정도화가응대정도상량아류실험임무("니인위주인공여하간?"화"약니시주인공여하간?")상적득분여반응시,제설신처지적압력/역경영향지구정도인지외,기여여결핍심리탄성인동지간차이균불현저,제시,심리탄성인동소각지도적엄중압력/역경영향원몰유결핍심리탄성인동소인위적경위지구。문장탐토료인동경위민감적압력/역경각지화상대이언인위엄중압력/역경몰유나요지구영향력지우심리탄성발전적의온。
How do resilient children perceive the stress/adversity(S/A) which they ever experienced or are experiencing? To tackle this issue can lead to unveiling the mechanism of resilience from the person-centered viewpoint.Using programs made via Visual FoxPro 8.0 and stories,the authors measured four dimensions of S/A perception including S/A sensitivity,perceived S/A severity, perceived S/A persistence,and perceived S/A manageability of resilient children and non-resilient counterparts.The results show that (1) in comparison with non-resilient children,resilient children are of higher S/A sensitivity for they get significantly higher scores of recall,recognition sensitivity,and S/A preference when a blur situation displayed,and the latter's response to hit the recognition S/ A items is quicker and their response bar lower;(2) there are no significant differences in the scores and response time of the other three dimension of S/A perception measured by two sub-tests(i.e."How does the protagonist think in your opinion?"and"How would you think if you were the protagonist?") between the two groups except S/A persistence measured in the"if you were the protagonist"sub-test,which indicates that resilient children are prone to view S/A as lass lasting in comparison with non-resilient ones.The implications of more sensitive and less lasting S/A perception to resilient development are discussed.