CAJ | 학술논문

我国力图通过“限塑令”来引导与规范公众的环保意识与资源循环意识，但效果并不如预期。由于对“限塑令”的合理性和有效性等的理解和认识存在诸多偏差，其执行可能导致较高的社会成本。惩罚性罚款的适用也面临着选择性执法以及机会成本的问题。相比较生硬的政策法规，以软性的增强民众环保自觉性教育无疑是新型的路径选择。同时现阶段替代品的使用也要坚持减量化、再使用、再循环的原则，只有从源头使用上减量，才是解决问题的首要所在。最后逐渐以软性的增强民众环保自觉性教育来替代生硬的政策法令。
아국력도통과“한소령”래인도여규범공음적배보의식여자원순배의식，단효과병불여예기。유우대“한소령”적합이성화유효성등적리해화인식존재제다편차，기집행가능도치교고적사회성본。징벌성벌관적괄용야면림착선택성집법이급궤회성본적문제。상비교생경적정책법규，이연성적증강민음배보자각성교육무의시신형적로경선택。동시현계단체대품적사용야요견지감양화、재사용、재순배적원칙，지유종원두사용상감량，재시해결문제적수요소재。최후축점이연성적증강민음배보자각성교육래체대생경적정책법령。
China tries to ＂Plastic limit orders＂ to guide＂ and regulate the public awareness of environmental protection and resource circulation consciousness, but the effect is not as expected. Because of the plastic limit to the rationality and validity of the existence of such understanding and knowledge, the execution may lead to higher social cost. Punitive fines apply also faces a selective enforcement and opportunity cost. Compared with the policies and regulations, curt environmental consciousness of soft public education is undoubtedly new path selection. At present the use of alternative is to adhere to reduce, reuse, recycle principle, only from the source, is used to solve the problem of the first place. Finally the enhancement in soft environment consciousness education instead of public policy laws of curt.