CAJ | 학술논문

尽管漏洞补充是一个法律方法论问题，但在现代法律方法论与法律本体论不断融合的背景下，在法律本体论上的不同立场，直接决定了法律方法上的不同操作。法律漏洞的概念、法律漏洞产生的原因以及法律漏洞补充的根据即是决定着漏洞补充理论如何展开的三个基本问题。法律漏洞乃是指因人类理性之局限，立法者无奈或故意造成的法律文本的意义不能与法学主流价值观念或民众期待完全契合而导致的法律文本与案件事实之间的裂隙。法律意识形态的多元化、立法权对司法权的不信任、法官类型思维能力的欠缺构成了法律漏洞产生的基本原因。法学理论以及民众期待则是对法律漏洞进行补充的实质性根据。
진관루동보충시일개법률방법론문제，단재현대법률방법론여법률본체론불단융합적배경하，재법률본체론상적불동립장，직접결정료법률방법상적불동조작。법률루동적개념、법률루동산생적원인이급법률루동보충적근거즉시결정착루동보충이론여하전개적삼개기본문제。법률루동내시지인인류이성지국한，입법자무내혹고의조성적법률문본적의의불능여법학주류개치관념혹민음기대완전계합이도치적법률문본여안건사실지간적렬극。법률의식형태적다원화、입법권대사법권적불신임、법관류형사유능력적흠결구성료법률루동산생적기본원인。법학이론이급민음기대칙시대법률루동진행보충적실질성근거。
Under the background of the harmonizing between legal methodology and law ontology, the difference position of the law ontology has great influence on the operation of the compensation for legal gaps. Three problems such as the concept of legal gap, the cause of legal gap and the foundation of compensation for the legal gap are basic problems of the compensation for legal gap theory., The meaning of legal gap is the gap between the code and case caused by the conflicting between the law context and the law theory or people＇ s expectation because of the limit of human rationality. Pluralistic legal ideology, legislative distrusting of jurisdiction and the lack in ability of judge＇ s categorized thinking are the found basic reasons. Law theory and people＇ s expectation are the virtual foundations of compensation for the legal gap.