CAJ | 학술논문

在具体梳理“衍”、“抛”、“澍”三个俗字意义的基础上，利用魏晋南北朝译经语料进一步比较其与相对应的正字“行”、“挽”、“漂”的语境差异后发现：俗字“抛”、“澍”的义项与其正字“挽”、“漂”基本对应，“衍”则只对应于“行”的名词性语义；在具体运用时，俗字的出现频率也远没有正字高，它们一般出现在相对单一的语境中。
재구체소리“연”、“포”、“주”삼개속자의의적기출상，이용위진남북조역경어료진일보비교기여상대응적정자“행”、“만”、“표”적어경차이후발현：속자“포”、“주”적의항여기정자“만”、“표”기본대응，“연”칙지대응우“행”적명사성어의；재구체운용시，속자적출현빈솔야원몰유정자고，타문일반출현재상대단일적어경중。
This paper studies on the contextual diferenceses between Chinese orthographic characters and folk characters based on the Buddhist sutra of Wei, Jin, and Southern and Northern Dynasties. After a detailed study on the three groups of Chinese characters, namely, hang （行/）, wan （挽/[扌勉） ,piao （漂/）, this paper finds that the meanings of ＂ ,＂＂ are basically corresponding to their orthographic counterparts ＂挽＂ ,＂漂＂; ＂＂ is only corresponding to ＂行＂ on the nominal sense level though; folk characters appear far less frequently than generally folk characters appear always in certain specific orthographic characters in actual usage, and contexts.