CAJ | 학술논문

2010年11月,美国加州中部联邦地区法院作出裁定,驳回索尼等个人电脑生产商关于撤销中国＂绿坝＂软件侵权诉讼的申请。法院主要理由是被告不能证明在美国诉讼使其承受和原告不成比例的＂烦扰＂和＂压迫＂。本案涉及美国＂法院不方便管辖原则＂的适用问题。本文认为,尽管在美国公民作为原告并在当地法院起诉的情况下,被告基于＂法院不方便管辖原则＂要求驳回诉讼比较困难,但中国企业仍然应该根据美国判例实践据理力争。
2010년11월,미국가주중부련방지구법원작출재정,박회색니등개인전뇌생산상관우철소중국＂록패＂연건침권소송적신청。법원주요이유시피고불능증명재미국소송사기승수화원고불성비례적＂번우＂화＂압박＂。본안섭급미국＂법원불방편관할원칙＂적괄용문제。본문인위,진관재미국공민작위원고병재당지법원기소적정황하,피고기우＂법원불방편관할원칙＂요구박회소송비교곤난,단중국기업잉연응해근거미국판례실천거리력쟁。
Plaintiff Solid Oak Software filed suit against the People＇s Republic of China et al.for misappropriation of trade secrets and copyright infringement for allegedly copying nearly 3 000 lines of code from Solid Oak＇s software program ＂CYBERsitter＂and disseminating it to tens of millions of end users in China.Defendant Sony Corporation,joined by Defendants Acer,Inc.,BenQ Corporation,and ASUSTeK Computer,Inc.,moves to dismiss the action on the grounds of forum non conveniens because California is an inconvenient forum and the dispute should be heard in China.On November 18,2010,the court of Central District of California denied Sony＇s Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens.Although it would be a hard work if Chinese company asserts a dismiss base on Forum Non Convenience,this article encourages the Chinese company to best use this doctrine of Forum Non Convenience when necessary based on the deep pre-research on the related American cases.