CAJ | 학술논문

本研究对英文摘要进行体裁对比分析,目的在于观察和比较中外语言研究者撰写英文摘要时使用的语步框架和词语型式。摘要体裁分析采用Santos（1996）的5语步模式;语料库分析软件为MonoConc Pro和Collocate 1.0（Barlow 2004a,2004b）。分析数据显示,中国研究者在英文摘要写作中实义词使用率偏高,部分词组过度使用,但同时又呈现摘要语步数量偏少,结论语步出现频率偏低的现象。就词语特征而言,中国研究者较少使用被动语态过去时和模糊限制语,摘要的文献引证缺少详细的出处。分析结果同时也显示了中外研究者在论文摘要写作上的相似之处。论文最后讨论了研究结果对英文摘要撰写和学术英语教学所带来的启示。
본연구대영문적요진행체재대비분석,목적재우관찰화비교중외어언연구자찬사영문적요시사용적어보광가화사어형식。적요체재분석채용Santos（1996）적5어보모식;어료고분석연건위MonoConc Pro화Collocate 1.0（Barlow 2004a,2004b）。분석수거현시,중국연구자재영문적요사작중실의사사용솔편고,부분사조과도사용,단동시우정현적요어보수량편소,결론어보출현빈솔편저적현상。취사어특정이언,중국연구자교소사용피동어태과거시화모호한제어,적요적문헌인증결소상세적출처。분석결과동시야현시료중외연구자재논문적요사작상적상사지처。논문최후토론료연구결과대영문적요찬사화학술영어교학소대래적계시。
Corpus-based research has received increasing attention in the field of English for Academic Purposes（EAP） as the analysis of existing spoken and written corpora helps ascertain patterns of authentic language use across different academic,cultural and linguistic settings.This study has examined abstracts written in English by first（L1） and second/foreign（L2/EFL） language speakers of English in the field of language teaching and learning.The aim of this study is to observe and compare the lexico-grammatical features and rhetorical patterns employed by these researchers for writing their abstracts.Using corpus software MonoConc Pro and Collocate 1.0（Barlow 2004a,2004b） and a 5-move framework for abstracts（Santos 1996）,frequency and concordance data of 26 English Abstracts for Language Teaching（EALT） and 26 Chinese English Abstracts for Language Teaching（CEALT） have been obtained.It is found that the Chinese researchers,in comparison to their L1 English counterparts,have employed fewer rhetorical moves,more content words than functional words,less passive voice and fewer hedging and detailed references,and have overused a higher number of words.Some similarities have also been observed.The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of EAP teaching and English abstracts writing.