兰州大学学报:社会科学版
蘭州大學學報:社會科學版
란주대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Lanzhor University(Social Sciences)
2011年
2期
52~59
,共null页
实体正义 程序正义 证据裁判主义 证据收集权 分配制度
實體正義 程序正義 證據裁判主義 證據收集權 分配製度
실체정의 정서정의 증거재판주의 증거수집권 분배제도
substantive justice; procedural justice; principle of evidentiary adjudication; right to evidence collection; distribution system
受证据裁判主义的影响,证据的质和量会对诉讼的结果产生重大影响。不同诉讼价值观下,民事证据收集制度存在较大差别。对案件实体正义的过分追求会导致在证据收集过程中法院职权作用过强,损及其中立地位,从而影响到程序本身的公正。而过分追求程序正义,排除法官介入证据收集,则可能会损及案件真实的发现,从而影响实体正义的实现。在对民事证据收集权进行分配和规范时,应充分考虑实体正义与程序正义之间的冲突与协调,合理分配不同民事证据收集主体的取证权限和范围,使得民事证据收集权的分配能体现实体正义和程序正义的平衡。
受證據裁判主義的影響,證據的質和量會對訴訟的結果產生重大影響。不同訴訟價值觀下,民事證據收集製度存在較大差彆。對案件實體正義的過分追求會導緻在證據收集過程中法院職權作用過彊,損及其中立地位,從而影響到程序本身的公正。而過分追求程序正義,排除法官介入證據收集,則可能會損及案件真實的髮現,從而影響實體正義的實現。在對民事證據收集權進行分配和規範時,應充分攷慮實體正義與程序正義之間的遲突與協調,閤理分配不同民事證據收集主體的取證權限和範圍,使得民事證據收集權的分配能體現實體正義和程序正義的平衡。
수증거재판주의적영향,증거적질화량회대소송적결과산생중대영향。불동소송개치관하,민사증거수집제도존재교대차별。대안건실체정의적과분추구회도치재증거수집과정중법원직권작용과강,손급기중입지위,종이영향도정서본신적공정。이과분추구정서정의,배제법관개입증거수집,칙가능회손급안건진실적발현,종이영향실체정의적실현。재대민사증거수집권진행분배화규범시,응충분고필실체정의여정서정의지간적충돌여협조,합리분배불동민사증거수집주체적취증권한화범위,사득민사증거수집권적분배능체현실체정의화정서정의적평형。
As guided by the principle of evidentiary adjudication,the quality and quantity of evidence are of great significance to the litigation process,and in different litigation values,the evidence collection systems are also different: the over-emphasis on substantive justice,which entails possible abuse of the power of the law court in evidence collection,is detrimental to the neutrality of the law court and,consequentially,intervenes with procedural justice; on the other hand,the over-emphasis on procedural justice,which excludes the intervention of the judge,is likely to hamper the exposure of truth and thus damages substantive justice.Therfore,a balance should be reached between these two in the evidence collection process so as to maximally realize justice at both ends.