人口学刊
人口學刊
인구학간
Population Journal
2011年
3期
37~46
,共null页
收入流动性 低收入者 状态依赖 农村
收入流動性 低收入者 狀態依賴 農村
수입류동성 저수입자 상태의뢰 농촌
income mobility, low paid residents, state dependence, rural area
通过多变量Probit模型考察我国农村贫困居民的收入流动性。分析两期之间农村贫困的状态依赖性,探讨决定我国农村居民当期免于贫困的因素,研究发现:人力资本投资中的教育投资和健康投资的反贫困效果最好;从贫困的状态依赖性来看,我国农村低收入者没有陷入明显的持续贫困,收入流动性较强;农村女性收入状况逐年改善,婚姻状况有利于缓解贫困,国家公务员或者企业经理,政府机关、国有企事业单位性质的员工陷入贫困的概率更低,东部地区居民容易免于贫困;改革开放的制度变迁给农村居民带来收入变动的机遇,同时也增加了他们收入的不稳定性;回归结果对低收入门槛的定义比较敏感,有必要在收入分布的“绝对贫困”区域上方再划定一个“基本贫困”区域。
通過多變量Probit模型攷察我國農村貧睏居民的收入流動性。分析兩期之間農村貧睏的狀態依賴性,探討決定我國農村居民噹期免于貧睏的因素,研究髮現:人力資本投資中的教育投資和健康投資的反貧睏效果最好;從貧睏的狀態依賴性來看,我國農村低收入者沒有陷入明顯的持續貧睏,收入流動性較彊;農村女性收入狀況逐年改善,婚姻狀況有利于緩解貧睏,國傢公務員或者企業經理,政府機關、國有企事業單位性質的員工陷入貧睏的概率更低,東部地區居民容易免于貧睏;改革開放的製度變遷給農村居民帶來收入變動的機遇,同時也增加瞭他們收入的不穩定性;迴歸結果對低收入門檻的定義比較敏感,有必要在收入分佈的“絕對貧睏”區域上方再劃定一箇“基本貧睏”區域。
통과다변량Probit모형고찰아국농촌빈곤거민적수입류동성。분석량기지간농촌빈곤적상태의뢰성,탐토결정아국농촌거민당기면우빈곤적인소,연구발현:인력자본투자중적교육투자화건강투자적반빈곤효과최호;종빈곤적상태의뢰성래간,아국농촌저수입자몰유함입명현적지속빈곤,수입류동성교강;농촌녀성수입상황축년개선,혼인상황유리우완해빈곤,국가공무원혹자기업경리,정부궤관、국유기사업단위성질적원공함입빈곤적개솔경저,동부지구거민용역면우빈곤;개혁개방적제도변천급농촌거민대래수입변동적궤우,동시야증가료타문수입적불은정성;회귀결과대저수입문함적정의비교민감,유필요재수입분포적“절대빈곤”구역상방재화정일개“기본빈곤”구역。
This article has discussed the income mobility of the rural poor in China using the multivariate Probit model, and through analysis of the transition of poverty between t - 2 and t, discussed the current antipoverty means for Chinese rural population, our discovery is : The education investment and health investment have better effect ; From the state dependence of the poverty, Chinese rural low - earning people do not relapse into obviously continuous poverty, and the income mobility is strong; The income of the rural female has improved in recent years and their marriage is helpful to eliminating poverty. While, national public servants, business managers and employees working for government, state - owned business is probably not getting into the poverty. Residents in East China are more likely avoid of poverty for reform and open policy increases the income of rural residents, and also enhances their income instability. The regressing outcome is sensitive to low incoming threshold, and it is necessary to define a "basic poverty" area on the top of "absolute poverty" area of income distribution.