中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2011年
4期
43~49
,共null页
区域科学发展 评价指标 评价体系 比较研究
區域科學髮展 評價指標 評價體繫 比較研究
구역과학발전 평개지표 평개체계 비교연구
regional scientific development; evaluation indicators; evaluation system; comparison study
构建区域科学发展评价体系需要解决区域发展要素协同演化的综合测度问题,通过利益统筹引导区域资源和谐配置。现有不同评价体系在设计原理、指标构成、数据处理与权重分配方面具有差异性,但评价结果具有相似性。它们的共性之处在于：以五个统筹为基础,逻辑主线是调解人与人之间、人与自然之间的矛盾;大多采用层次分析法和模糊数学法,不能反映出指标之间的包含关系、相关关系以及逻辑关系,可能导致具有高度相关性的指标被重复使用;仅适合一般区域评价,不适合特定区域评价;评价方法较为单一、评价指标设置过多、以人为本的思想尚未充分体现。本文提出了进一步的研究内容：以实现包容性增长为目标构建区域发展要素资本体系;指标的内在逻辑关系围绕经济学模式、社会学模式、生态学模式展开;并将区域可比性、区域特殊性、区域层次性、发展潜力性、指标前瞻性等纳入评价体系的范畴。
構建區域科學髮展評價體繫需要解決區域髮展要素協同縯化的綜閤測度問題,通過利益統籌引導區域資源和諧配置。現有不同評價體繫在設計原理、指標構成、數據處理與權重分配方麵具有差異性,但評價結果具有相似性。它們的共性之處在于：以五箇統籌為基礎,邏輯主線是調解人與人之間、人與自然之間的矛盾;大多採用層次分析法和模糊數學法,不能反映齣指標之間的包含關繫、相關關繫以及邏輯關繫,可能導緻具有高度相關性的指標被重複使用;僅適閤一般區域評價,不適閤特定區域評價;評價方法較為單一、評價指標設置過多、以人為本的思想尚未充分體現。本文提齣瞭進一步的研究內容：以實現包容性增長為目標構建區域髮展要素資本體繫;指標的內在邏輯關繫圍繞經濟學模式、社會學模式、生態學模式展開;併將區域可比性、區域特殊性、區域層次性、髮展潛力性、指標前瞻性等納入評價體繫的範疇。
구건구역과학발전평개체계수요해결구역발전요소협동연화적종합측도문제,통과이익통주인도구역자원화해배치。현유불동평개체계재설계원리、지표구성、수거처리여권중분배방면구유차이성,단평개결과구유상사성。타문적공성지처재우：이오개통주위기출,라집주선시조해인여인지간、인여자연지간적모순;대다채용층차분석법화모호수학법,불능반영출지표지간적포함관계、상관관계이급라집관계,가능도치구유고도상관성적지표피중복사용;부괄합일반구역평개,불괄합특정구역평개;평개방법교위단일、평개지표설치과다、이인위본적사상상미충분체현。본문제출료진일보적연구내용：이실현포용성증장위목표구건구역발전요소자본체계;지표적내재라집관계위요경제학모식、사회학모식、생태학모식전개;병장구역가비성、구역특수성、구역층차성、발전잠력성、지표전첨성등납입평개체계적범주。
How to measure the co-evaluation of the elements should be resolved when the evaluation system of the regional scientific development is constructed,which is helpful to a harmonious allocation of regional resources through the overall planning of interests.The exiting systems have the similar results but differ on the principles,index,data processed and weight distribution.Their similarify is they in common,are based on five balances and their main logical line is to adjust the contradictions between man and man,and man and the nature.They use the methods of AHP and the fuzzy mathematics,which usually cause high correlation indicators to be used repeatedly when they can not reflect the containing,correlating and logical relationship.They are only suitable to the general condition,but not vice versa in special conditions.They use the single method and set more indicators,which can not reflect the people-oriented management philosophy.It is suggested to further research as follow： First,the system will be set on the goal to be helpful to the inclusive growth.Secondly,the relationship of indicators will be illustrated logically as economic,sociological and ecological modes.Finally,regional comparability,regional particularity,the regional level,development potential and prospective index and others will be taken info account.
