CAJ | 학술논문

以小学六年级思考型和冲动型儿童各32名为被试,通过考查儿童在完成不同难度拼图任务时的表现,探讨不同认知风格儿童在问题解决中认知活动和元认知活动的差异。结果发现：（1）在线与离线元认知监控均表现出认知风格与任务难度的交互作用。在简单和中等任务中,思考型的儿童运用更多的在线元认知监控,进行计划和检查的时间更长。离线元认知监控的差异只表现在简单任务中,思考型比冲动型儿童花费更多的时间进行预测和评价;（2）在问题解决结果上,认知风格不同的儿童完成任务的时间没有显著差异;（3）在问题解决过程中,冲动型儿童解决问题的操作步数多于思考型儿童;冲动型儿童更多地使用主体参照策略,而思考型儿童更多使用线索推断策略。
이소학륙년급사고형화충동형인동각32명위피시,통과고사인동재완성불동난도병도임무시적표현,탐토불동인지풍격인동재문제해결중인지활동화원인지활동적차이。결과발현：（1）재선여리선원인지감공균표현출인지풍격여임무난도적교호작용。재간단화중등임무중,사고형적인동운용경다적재선원인지감공,진행계화화검사적시간경장。리선원인지감공적차이지표현재간단임무중,사고형비충동형인동화비경다적시간진행예측화평개;（2）재문제해결결과상,인지풍격불동적인동완성임무적시간몰유현저차이;（3）재문제해결과정중,충동형인동해결문제적조작보수다우사고형인동;충동형인동경다지사용주체삼조책략,이사고형인동경다사용선색추단책략。
The present study examined the performance of children identified as reflective or impulsive on the three jigsaw-puzzle tasks with different complexity; explored the individual differences of problem solving and metacognition in reflective- impulsive cognitive style. The results revealed： 1 ） Interactive effect between cognitive style and task complexity was significant. The reflective children spent more time for ongoing and offline metaeognitive monitoring in simple task, for ongoing metacognitive monitoring in moderate task. 2 ） There was no significant difference on the results of problem solving between the two group children. 3 ） The impulsive children used more steps to solve the problems, and tended to complete the puzzle according the main structure, while the reflective children prefer inferring according the picture clues.