心理发展与教育
心理髮展與教育
심리발전여교육
Psychological Development and Education
2011年
3期
319~328
,共null页
周司丽 侯志瑾 邵瑾 珠玛
週司麗 侯誌瑾 邵瑾 珠瑪
주사려 후지근 소근 주마
情绪调节 反应方式 父母 高二学生 自我决定理论
情緒調節 反應方式 父母 高二學生 自我決定理論
정서조절 반응방식 부모 고이학생 자아결정이론
emotion regulation; reaction mode; second-year senior high school student; Self-Determination Theory
以自我决定理论为理论依据,对500名高二学生进行问卷调查,采用结构方程模型的统计方法分析了在悲伤、害怕、生气三种情绪条件下,父亲、母亲的反应方式与高二男生、女生情绪调节方式之间的两种关系模型。模型比较结果显示,父、母反应方式对高二年级青少年情绪调节方式的预测作用小于高二年级青少年情绪调节方式对其父、母反应方式的预测作用,这一点在女生身上更为突出;高二年级青少年的情绪调节方式与其父母反应方式之间的关系表现出了性别差异;在不同情绪条件下,高二年级青少年的情绪调节方式对父母反应方式的预测关系表现出了一致性;父亲、母亲对高二学生消极情绪调节方式的反应也表现出了一致性。
以自我決定理論為理論依據,對500名高二學生進行問捲調查,採用結構方程模型的統計方法分析瞭在悲傷、害怕、生氣三種情緒條件下,父親、母親的反應方式與高二男生、女生情緒調節方式之間的兩種關繫模型。模型比較結果顯示,父、母反應方式對高二年級青少年情緒調節方式的預測作用小于高二年級青少年情緒調節方式對其父、母反應方式的預測作用,這一點在女生身上更為突齣;高二年級青少年的情緒調節方式與其父母反應方式之間的關繫錶現齣瞭性彆差異;在不同情緒條件下,高二年級青少年的情緒調節方式對父母反應方式的預測關繫錶現齣瞭一緻性;父親、母親對高二學生消極情緒調節方式的反應也錶現齣瞭一緻性。
이자아결정이론위이론의거,대500명고이학생진행문권조사,채용결구방정모형적통계방법분석료재비상、해파、생기삼충정서조건하,부친、모친적반응방식여고이남생、녀생정서조절방식지간적량충관계모형。모형비교결과현시,부、모반응방식대고이년급청소년정서조절방식적예측작용소우고이년급청소년정서조절방식대기부、모반응방식적예측작용,저일점재녀생신상경위돌출;고이년급청소년적정서조절방식여기부모반응방식지간적관계표현출료성별차이;재불동정서조건하,고이년급청소년적정서조절방식대부모반응방식적예측관계표현출료일치성;부친、모친대고이학생소겁정서조절방식적반응야표현출료일치성。
The study examined the relation between fathers and mothers' reactions to students' negative emotions (sadness, fear, and anger) and emotion regulation modes of second-year senior high school students (male and female) based on Self-Determination Theory. A questionnaire survey was conducted with a final sample size of 500 students. Structural Equation Model was used to compare two theoretical models. The results indicated that the emotion regulation modes of the targeted participants were more predictive to their parents' reaction modes, comparing to the predictiveness of parents' reaction modes to students' emotion regulation modes. This finding was more significant for female students than for males. The relation between students' emotion regulation modes and their parents' reaction modes were similar under all emotion conditions; fathers and mothers' reaction to students' emotion regulation modes were similar as well. However, difference existed between female and male students on the relation between their emotion regulation modes and their parents' reaction modes. Specifically, male students' suppressive and dysregulated emotion regulations predicted both fathers and mothers' controlling reactions, and their integrated emotion regulation modes predicted both fathers and mothers' supportive reactions. Regarding the female students, their suppressive and dysregulated emotion regulation modes could predict both father and mothers' controlling reactions, .while their integrated emotion regulation mode could not predict parents' supportive reactions.