CAJ | 학술논문

在实际运行中，CSSCI数据库和中文核心期刊要目总览一样，存在着许多亟待商榷的问题。面对日益变化着的多彩世界，档案期刊应该尽快找准定位，适时“变脸”。如果某期刊的编辑和作者不注意引文，该期刊的“总被引次数”、“影响因子”就可能下滑，而这些指标恰恰就是遴选CSSCI数据库与核心期刊的基础指标。长此下去，期刊极有可能因为遴选基础指标的问题被挤出局。所以，档案期刊要加强对参考文献的规范和引导。
재실제운행중，CSSCI수거고화중문핵심기간요목총람일양，존재착허다극대상각적문제。면대일익변화착적다채세계，당안기간응해진쾌조준정위，괄시“변검”。여과모기간적편집화작자불주의인문，해기간적“총피인차수”、“영향인자”취가능하활，이저사지표흡흡취시린선CSSCI수거고여핵심기간적기출지표。장차하거，기간겁유가능인위린선기출지표적문제피제출국。소이，당안기간요가강대삼고문헌적규범화인도。
The Chinese Social Science Citation Index （CSSCI）, along with the Chinese Core Journal Catalogue has been and continues to be a heated subject of various debates; especially the problems appeaced in their actual function. Magazines and journals of archive science in particular need to find a new orientation to cope with the ever-changing academic environment. If either the editors or writers of a certain journal neglected where their references and bibliography came form, the ＂total frequency of being cited＂ and the ＂factor of influence＂ would take a sudden down turn. As the ＂total frequency of being cited＂ and the ＂factor of influence＂ are the basic standards to judge whether a journal is qualified for CSSCI and the Chinese Core Journal Catalogue, the above-mentioned journal would probably be put out in sequence. Therefore, the journal of archive science will need to standardize and guide their writer＇s citation of references and bibliography.