法律科学:西北政法学院学报
法律科學:西北政法學院學報
법률과학:서북정법학원학보
Science of Law
2011年
3期
132~141
,共null页
商标 商标转让 商誉 营业 品质保证
商標 商標轉讓 商譽 營業 品質保證
상표 상표전양 상예 영업 품질보증
trademark; assignment; goodwill; business; quality guarantee
作为商标这一符号的所指,商誉乃是其不可分割的组成部分。传统商标转让规则,无论要求商标连同商誉转让抑或允许其单独转让,其表述本身就背离了符号学基本原理,在适用过程中最终都转换为,要求商标连同营业转让或允许其自由转让。不进行这样的转换,上述规则根本就无从适用,更遑论合理与否。历史地看,商标转让制度经历了从连同转让向自由转让的模式转变。在当代,包括我国在内的各主要国家和地区实际适用的都是自由转让模式,这也正是巴黎公约和TRIPs协定所持基本立场。在我国,出于保护消费者利益的考虑,立法者还为商标受让人设定了品质保证义务。表面看来,上述规定系商标品质保证功能的具体体现,实则违背商标制度的运行机理,理当删除。
作為商標這一符號的所指,商譽迺是其不可分割的組成部分。傳統商標轉讓規則,無論要求商標連同商譽轉讓抑或允許其單獨轉讓,其錶述本身就揹離瞭符號學基本原理,在適用過程中最終都轉換為,要求商標連同營業轉讓或允許其自由轉讓。不進行這樣的轉換,上述規則根本就無從適用,更遑論閤理與否。歷史地看,商標轉讓製度經歷瞭從連同轉讓嚮自由轉讓的模式轉變。在噹代,包括我國在內的各主要國傢和地區實際適用的都是自由轉讓模式,這也正是巴黎公約和TRIPs協定所持基本立場。在我國,齣于保護消費者利益的攷慮,立法者還為商標受讓人設定瞭品質保證義務。錶麵看來,上述規定繫商標品質保證功能的具體體現,實則違揹商標製度的運行機理,理噹刪除。
작위상표저일부호적소지,상예내시기불가분할적조성부분。전통상표전양규칙,무론요구상표련동상예전양억혹윤허기단독전양,기표술본신취배리료부호학기본원리,재괄용과정중최종도전환위,요구상표련동영업전양혹윤허기자유전양。불진행저양적전환,상술규칙근본취무종괄용,경황론합리여부。역사지간,상표전양제도경력료종련동전양향자유전양적모식전변。재당대,포괄아국재내적각주요국가화지구실제괄용적도시자유전양모식,저야정시파려공약화TRIPs협정소지기본립장。재아국,출우보호소비자이익적고필,입법자환위상표수양인설정료품질보증의무。표면간래,상술규정계상표품질보증공능적구체체현,실칙위배상표제도적운행궤리,리당산제。
As it signifies, goodwill is an inseparable part of a trademark. The traditional trademark assignment doctrine, no matter it requires a trademark be assigned with goodwill or allows it be assigned in gross, the formulation itself deviates the basic principle of semiotics, therefore the actual effect of the doctrine always transforms to require the business be assigned with or allows a trademark be assigned in gross. Without the above transformation, the doctrine can not be applied, let alone its reasonableness. Historically, the trademark assignment system has gradually evolved from the doctrine of assignment with business to assignment in gross. Currently, the doctrine actually adopted by most nations is assignment in gross, which is in accordance with the basic position of Paris Convention and TRIPs agreement. In the viewpoint of consumer protection, an assignee has to undertake legal obligation concerning quality guarantee according to Chinese trademark law,. The above stipulation, superficially, is the concrete incarnation of trademark's quality guarantee function, but actually goes against the mechanism of trademark institution, therefore should be deleted.