CAJ | 학술논문

＂异化主线论＂是学术界对《手稿》逻辑主线的流行定位,受此影响,国内学术界还有一改良性提法,即认为《手稿》中存在＂人本学异化劳动逻辑＂和＂客观唯物主义逻辑＂两种相互矛盾、截然对立的主线。本文通过对《手稿》文本的解读,批判了以上两种观点,指出《手稿》中贯穿的一条逻辑主线是＂新唯物主义实践观＂。异化劳动和对象化活动是实践观的两个层面,二者是特殊与一般的关系;可以用一般的实践观说明异化劳动和对象化活动。
＂이화주선론＂시학술계대《수고》라집주선적류행정위,수차영향,국내학술계환유일개량성제법,즉인위《수고》중존재＂인본학이화노동라집＂화＂객관유물주의라집＂량충상호모순、절연대립적주선。본문통과대《수고》문본적해독,비판료이상량충관점,지출《수고》중관천적일조라집주선시＂신유물주의실천관＂。이화노동화대상화활동시실천관적량개층면,이자시특수여일반적관계;가이용일반적실천관설명이화노동화대상화활동。
That alienation is the logical line of Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 is a popular viewpoint in the academic world. Influenced by this viewpoint, there is an alternative viewpoint in Chinese academic circles, that is, there are two antithetical logical lines in Manuscripts, one is the logical line of humanistic alienated labor, the other the logical line of objective materialism. By analyzing the text of Manuscripts, this paper criticizes the above two viewpoints and points out that the logical line of Manuscripts should be the new materialist view of practice, with a special and general relationship, alienated labor and objectification activities are the two aspects of view of practice, they can be described by general view of practice.