CAJ | 학술논문

本文对美国国立卫生研究院下属院内研究所的投入产出进行分析,选取同样专注于生物医学领域、以研究为主的洛克菲勒大学作为参比对象。对比方面包括两所机构的规模、经费、文章数目、诺贝尔奖以及院士得主情况。分析表明：科研的投入多,不能保证效果好。科技体制包括经费资助体系对科研产出起着关键作用。稳定支持和竞争相结合的科研投入,产出效果更好;通过Peer Review的竞争性项目的计划更完善,产出更好;科研队伍越精干,投入产出比越高。
본문대미국국립위생연구원하속원내연구소적투입산출진행분석,선취동양전주우생물의학영역、이연구위주적락극비륵대학작위삼비대상。대비방면포괄량소궤구적규모、경비、문장수목、낙패이장이급원사득주정황。분석표명：과연적투입다,불능보증효과호。과기체제포괄경비자조체계대과연산출기착관건작용。은정지지화경쟁상결합적과연투입,산출효과경호;통과Peer Review적경쟁성항목적계화경완선,산출경호;과연대오월정간,투입산출비월고。
The research performance of NIH intramural institutes is compared with that of Rockefeller University,which is also focused on the biomedical area.The comparison includes institution size,research funding,the number of papers published in Science/Nature/Cell,the number of Nobel Prize winners,and the number of members in National Academy of Sciences between two organizations.The analysis shows that the quantities of funding can not grantee the quality of scientific research.The scientific research system,not funding itself,decides the research performance.The combination of competing and non-competing funds and the high quality research team can bring up better performance.Also the competing projects under the peer review are more effective.