CAJ | 학술논문

马克思的早期思想深受费尔巴哈的影响，但他对费尔巴哈的唯物主义观点并未完全认可。费尔巴哈由于立足于抽象人本主义和直观的唯物主义，在自然观上坚持自然的本质与人的理性本质的对立，而在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中，马克思立足于工业和实践却认为两者具有统一性。这种分歧源于费尔巴哈在人对自然的关系的理解上停留在感性直观的层面，而马克思则达到了人的感性的对象化活动的层面。这种分歧更为深刻的认识论根源在于两人对黑格尔辩证法的不同理解。
마극사적조기사상심수비이파합적영향，단타대비이파합적유물주의관점병미완전인가。비이파합유우립족우추상인본주의화직관적유물주의，재자연관상견지자연적본질여인적이성본질적대립，이재《1844년경제학철학수고》중，마극사립족우공업화실천각인위량자구유통일성。저충분기원우비이파합재인대자연적관계적리해상정류재감성직관적층면，이마극사칙체도료인적감성적대상화활동적층면。저충분기경위심각적인식론근원재우량인대흑격이변증법적불동리해。
In the earlier period, Marx was deeply effected by Feuerbach＇s idea, but he didn＇t approve completely of the materialist viewpoint of Feuerbach. On the basis of the abstract humanism and materialism intuitive,Feuerbach insisted that the essence of the nature and the rational essence of the person were opposite. Based on industry and practice, Marx thought the essence of the nature and the person had unity from Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. This kind of difference came from Feuerbach＇s comprehension of the person＇s relation to the nature. Feuerbach＇s comprehension still stayed around the sensibility and visual level. However,Marx＇s comprehension of the person＇s relation to the nature had reached the level of the object activity of person＇s sensibility. The deep epistemology source of this kind of difference came from their different comprehension of Hegel＇s dialectics.