CAJ | 학술논문

老子和亚里士多德都将＂自然＂概念作为各自哲学的核心范畴之一,二者都对＂自然＂做出各自的规定,尽管他们的规定有些许相似,但存在很大差异。作为东西方哲学早期的两位代表,这些差异一定程度上反映了东西方哲学思维格局与思考重心的不同。
노자화아리사다덕도장＂자연＂개념작위각자철학적핵심범주지일,이자도대＂자연＂주출각자적규정,진관타문적규정유사허상사,단존재흔대차이。작위동서방철학조기적량위대표,저사차이일정정도상반영료동서방철학사유격국여사고중심적불동。
Both Lao Zi and Aristotle considered ＂nature＂ one of the core concepts in their philosophies,and each offered his own definition of it.Although their definitions are somewhat similar,great differences do exist between them.This paper argues that,since they are early representatives of the Eastern and Western philosophies,their different notions of ＂nature＂ partly reflect the diversities in thinking patterns and kernels of the Eastern and Western philosophies.