CAJ | 학술논문

依改革思路所包含的元素多少以及倾向性的政策主张的不同,可以大致把过去30年关于中国法律改革研究划分为一元直线式的改革思路、二元协调式的改革思路与多元协调式的改革思路。此三种法律改革思路,尽管在实际政策主张上可能存在重大分歧,但在知识层面上不是一种相互矛盾或对立的关系,而是一种基础性支持和递进扩展的关系。随着考虑元素的增加,法律改革思路的复杂性呈递增趋势,与实践操作的距离也有可能相对拉近。就目前中国的法律改革现状和趋势看,特别是从中国法治发展战略的宏观层面看,适度提倡和推进多元协调式的法律改革思路问题研究,无论对于拓宽法学的研究方向,或是对于中国的法治实践,都已经显出了某种必要性和迫切性。
의개혁사로소포함적원소다소이급경향성적정책주장적불동,가이대치파과거30년관우중국법률개혁연구화분위일원직선식적개혁사로、이원협조식적개혁사로여다원협조식적개혁사로。차삼충법률개혁사로,진관재실제정책주장상가능존재중대분기,단재지식층면상불시일충상호모순혹대립적관계,이시일충기출성지지화체진확전적관계。수착고필원소적증가,법률개혁사로적복잡성정체증추세,여실천조작적거리야유가능상대랍근。취목전중국적법률개혁현상화추세간,특별시종중국법치발전전략적굉관층면간,괄도제창화추진다원협조식적법률개혁사로문제연구,무론대우탁관법학적연구방향,혹시대우중국적법치실천,도이경현출료모충필요성화박절성。
According to the number of elements and the differences between tendentious policy advocacies incorporated in the reform thinking,the research on the law reform in China in the past 30 years could be generally divided into unary linear thinking,binary coordinated thinking and polynary coordinated thinking.Although there may exist significant divergences on practical policy advocacy,it＇s not a sort of contradictory or opposite relationship,but a sort of infrastructural support and progressive expansion relationship.As the considered elements increase,the complexity of the thinking of law reform appears an increasing tendency and the distance away from practical operation may be relatively closer.As regard to the present law reform status and tendency in China,especially on the micro-level of development strategy of rule of law in China,appropriate advocating and promoting the research on the problem of polynary coordinated law reform thinking,both for broadening the research direction of law and for the rule of law practice in China,already appears sort of necessity and urgency.