经济问题
經濟問題
경제문제
On Economic Problems
2011年
7期
34~38
,共null页
财政支农 价格支持 直接收入补贴 间接支农 市场一体化
財政支農 價格支持 直接收入補貼 間接支農 市場一體化
재정지농 개격지지 직접수입보첩 간접지농 시장일체화
financial support to agriculture; price support; direct income subsidy; indirect support to agriculture; market integration 0 HAN Feng-wu（Zhejiang University College of Economic; Hangzhou 310027; China） Abstract：Technology effects; scale economics and industry transfer are taken as channels by which trade openness and financial openness interact each other in the paper.The regression found that there are positively affect on both.But only Industry Transfer is a valid channel in all channels.Scale Economics only positively interacts with trade openness and Technology Effect negatively interacts with trade openness.And both Technology Effect and Scale Economics have significant relationships with financial openness.Based on the structure variables auto regression variances decomposition; variances fluctuation of Industry transfer can explain the more ones for trade openness and financial openness than sums of technology effect and scale economics. Key words：financial openness; trade openness; interact channels
以增加农民收入从而支撑具有产业、区域特征的市场一体化为视角,对财政政策不同的支农方式和支农工具所产生的不同的农业市场一体化效应进行了分析,认为直接收入补贴明显好于价格支持;间接支农优于直接支农;而且不同的支农项目对市场一体化的促进作用差异显著。为此,提出了逐步减少价格支持,增加直接收入补贴,增加财政间接支农力度,引导农业生产要素多渠道利用,促进农业系统内外部合作,重视＂三农＂无形资产,建立适当监督机制等政策建议。
以增加農民收入從而支撐具有產業、區域特徵的市場一體化為視角,對財政政策不同的支農方式和支農工具所產生的不同的農業市場一體化效應進行瞭分析,認為直接收入補貼明顯好于價格支持;間接支農優于直接支農;而且不同的支農項目對市場一體化的促進作用差異顯著。為此,提齣瞭逐步減少價格支持,增加直接收入補貼,增加財政間接支農力度,引導農業生產要素多渠道利用,促進農業繫統內外部閤作,重視＂三農＂無形資產,建立適噹鑑督機製等政策建議。
이증가농민수입종이지탱구유산업、구역특정적시장일체화위시각,대재정정책불동적지농방식화지농공구소산생적불동적농업시장일체화효응진행료분석,인위직접수입보첩명현호우개격지지;간접지농우우직접지농;이차불동적지농항목대시장일체화적촉진작용차이현저。위차,제출료축보감소개격지지,증가직접수입보첩,증가재정간접지농력도,인도농업생산요소다거도이용,촉진농업계통내외부합작,중시＂삼농＂무형자산,건립괄당감독궤제등정책건의。
From the view angle of market integration with industrial and regional characteristics based on the supports from increasing farmers＇ income,this paper discusses different market integration effects of different financial incentives to agriculture.It is argued that direct income subsidy is apparently better than price support;indirect support is superior to direct one;and also distinct differences exist amongst different supporting projects in terms of promoting agricultural market integration.Therefore,this paper suggests that price support should be gradually reduced,direct income subsidy increased,indirect supports strengthened,multi-channel utilization of agricultural factors guided,cooperation between intra-and extra-agricultural systems promoted,＂three-dimension-agricultural＂ intangible assets attached great importance to,and proper supervisory mechanism established.
