河北学刊
河北學刊
하북학간
Hebei Academic Journal
2011年
4期
152~155
,共null页
《中华人民共和国合同法》 无权处分 传统民法
《中華人民共和國閤同法》 無權處分 傳統民法
《중화인민공화국합동법》 무권처분 전통민법
Contract Law of the People's Republic of China; disposition without right; traditional civil law
无权处分被称作"民法学上的精灵",在德国法上指处分行为,处分行为以有处分权为生效要件,因此,无权处分行为在效力上为效力待定行为。《中华人民共和国合同法》第51条将无权处分界定为待追认的法律行为,即将此债权行为的效力定位于效力待定,从而引起无权处分制度与善意取得、瑕疵担保等制度的冲突与矛盾,而这些冲突与矛盾在德国法下是不存在的。笔者试图从传统民法角度准确把握《中华人民共和国合同法》上的无权处分制度,并探求合理妥当的解释其法学肌理的路径。
無權處分被稱作"民法學上的精靈",在德國法上指處分行為,處分行為以有處分權為生效要件,因此,無權處分行為在效力上為效力待定行為。《中華人民共和國閤同法》第51條將無權處分界定為待追認的法律行為,即將此債權行為的效力定位于效力待定,從而引起無權處分製度與善意取得、瑕疵擔保等製度的遲突與矛盾,而這些遲突與矛盾在德國法下是不存在的。筆者試圖從傳統民法角度準確把握《中華人民共和國閤同法》上的無權處分製度,併探求閤理妥噹的解釋其法學肌理的路徑。
무권처분피칭작"민법학상적정령",재덕국법상지처분행위,처분행위이유처분권위생효요건,인차,무권처분행위재효력상위효력대정행위。《중화인민공화국합동법》제51조장무권처분계정위대추인적법률행위,즉장차채권행위적효력정위우효력대정,종이인기무권처분제도여선의취득、하자담보등제도적충돌여모순,이저사충돌여모순재덕국법하시불존재적。필자시도종전통민법각도준학파악《중화인민공화국합동법》상적무권처분제도,병탐구합리타당적해석기법학기리적로경。
As "the elves" of civil law,entitled to dispose in Germany law refers to sanction actions,The disciplinary right of disposal action to have effective elements,so,for Entitled to sanction actions in effectiveness for effectiveness undetermined behavior.Our country "contract law" the article 51 shall not be entitled to dispose of ratification for to define the legal behavior,Will the creditor's rights behavior located in effect a backlog,Thus cause has no right to sanction system and good faith acquisition,such institutional defect warranty of conflict and contradiction,And these conflicts,contradictions in Germany method is nonexistent.The author tries to from traditional civil law Angle of Chinese contract law accurately grasp on to sanction system,And explore the reasonable explanation is the law of the path of the texture.