经济研究
經濟研究
경제연구
Economic Research Journal
2011年
7期
102~115
,共null页
货币供给 金融危机 非线性调节 冲击效应
貨幣供給 金融危機 非線性調節 遲擊效應
화폐공급 금융위궤 비선성조절 충격효응
Monetary Supply; Financial Crisis; Nonlinear Adjustment; Shock Effect
本文针对我国货币政策的操作特征,使用阈值协整方法扩展现有的货币需求模型,度量后金融危机时期的货币供给过剩及其对通胀与经济增长的非线性调节效应,并进而设定广义脉冲响应函数揭示货币供给过剩对通胀与经济增长的冲击效应。主要结论为:2009年第三季度以后,我国货币供给过剩且过剩幅度快速增加,其中名义M1过剩12.56%,名义M2过剩11.31%。2009Q3--2010Q3我国处于货币供给过剩机制下,在该机制下,央行谨慎地实施从紧货币政策,从紧货币政策对通胀和经济增长的调节效应相对较强。货币供给过剩对通胀和经济增长的冲击在前2年为正值,在随后近3年为负值。这说明我国现阶段适度宽松货币政策的退出必须谨慎,退出速度不宜过快。
本文針對我國貨幣政策的操作特徵,使用閾值協整方法擴展現有的貨幣需求模型,度量後金融危機時期的貨幣供給過剩及其對通脹與經濟增長的非線性調節效應,併進而設定廣義脈遲響應函數揭示貨幣供給過剩對通脹與經濟增長的遲擊效應。主要結論為:2009年第三季度以後,我國貨幣供給過剩且過剩幅度快速增加,其中名義M1過剩12.56%,名義M2過剩11.31%。2009Q3--2010Q3我國處于貨幣供給過剩機製下,在該機製下,央行謹慎地實施從緊貨幣政策,從緊貨幣政策對通脹和經濟增長的調節效應相對較彊。貨幣供給過剩對通脹和經濟增長的遲擊在前2年為正值,在隨後近3年為負值。這說明我國現階段適度寬鬆貨幣政策的退齣必鬚謹慎,退齣速度不宜過快。
본문침대아국화폐정책적조작특정,사용역치협정방법확전현유적화폐수구모형,도량후금융위궤시기적화폐공급과잉급기대통창여경제증장적비선성조절효응,병진이설정엄의맥충향응함수게시화폐공급과잉대통창여경제증장적충격효응。주요결론위:2009년제삼계도이후,아국화폐공급과잉차과잉폭도쾌속증가,기중명의M1과잉12.56%,명의M2과잉11.31%。2009Q3--2010Q3아국처우화폐공급과잉궤제하,재해궤제하,앙행근신지실시종긴화폐정책,종긴화폐정책대통창화경제증장적조절효응상대교강。화폐공급과잉대통창화경제증장적충격재전2년위정치,재수후근3년위부치。저설명아국현계단괄도관송화폐정책적퇴출필수근신,퇴출속도불의과쾌。
To measure the monetary supply excess and its nonlinear adjustment effects to inflation and economic growth, this paper expands the existing model of money demand using threshold cointegration on the base of operating characteristics of monetary policy. Furthermore, aiming at the conditions of money supply excess, this paper reveals the shock effects of money supply excess to inflation and economic growth by setting generalized impulse response function. The results show that there is liquidity excess in China after 2009Q3 and the liquidity excess extent becomes bigger and bigger. At 2010Q3, the exless degree of Mt and M2 is 12. 56% and 11.31% respectivdy. The monetary police can be divided into monetary supply insufficient regime and monetary supply excess regime. China is in the monetary supply excess regime from 2009Q3 to 2010Q3. The central bank carefully implements tightening monetary policy and the adjustment effects of monetary police are bigger in monetary supply excess regime. The shock effect of monetary supply excess to economic growth and inflation is positive in the first two years about, and turns to negative in following 3 years about. Those results indicate that the loose monetary policy should withdraw from practice, but the withdraw speed should not be too fast and the operation of monetary policy should be flexible.