CAJ | 학술논문

《合同法》确认了房屋承租人的优先购买权,但承租人的这一权利经常与《物权法》规定的共有人的优先购买权发生冲突。要化解承租人与共有人的优先购买权冲突,不能局限于＂物权优先于债权＂的一般论证,更不能用＂买卖不破租赁＂实现对承租人优先购买权的功能替代,而应当从价值评判的角度进行分析。与单独所有相比较,共有这种形态并不是一种很有效率的产权安排方式,现代社会应当尽量创造机会减少财产共有形态的存在,而共有人的优先购买权恰恰具有简化乃至消灭共有关系的重要价值,所以,应当优先于承租人的优先购买权。
《합동법》학인료방옥승조인적우선구매권,단승조인적저일권리경상여《물권법》규정적공유인적우선구매권발생충돌。요화해승조인여공유인적우선구매권충돌,불능국한우＂물권우선우채권＂적일반론증,경불능용＂매매불파조임＂실현대승조인우선구매권적공능체대,이응당종개치평판적각도진행분석。여단독소유상비교,공유저충형태병불시일충흔유효솔적산권안배방식,현대사회응당진량창조궤회감소재산공유형태적존재,이공유인적우선구매권흡흡구유간화내지소멸공유관계적중요개치,소이,응당우선우승조인적우선구매권。
House leaseholders＇ preemptive right has been confirmed by Contract Law,but this right may often be in conflict with the preemptive right of co-owner which be impowered by Property Law.To resolve the conflict,we can＇t be limited to the proof of ＂property rights take precedence over creditors right＂,and the rule ＂sales cannot devastate lease＂ isn＇t the functional alternative of house leaseholders＇ preemptive right.Compared with individual ownership,co-ownership isn＇t a kind of efficient property right arrangement,so today＇s society should try to creat opportunities to reduce the presence of co-ownership.Co-owners＇ preemptive right may simplify even eliminate the co-ownership,so it should take precedence over house leaseholders＇ preemptive right.