学术月刊
學術月刊
학술월간
Academic Monthly
2011年
7期
45~52
,共null页
福柯 管治 身体 人口 权力关系
福柯 管治 身體 人口 權力關繫
복가 관치 신체 인구 권력관계
Michel Foucault, police, body, population, power relations
权力关系的详尽阐发是福柯政治哲学的重要内容,管治作为17、18世纪西方治理技艺在权力关系领域内运作所使用的主要政治技术之一,旨在维持国内秩序和增强国力之间确立起可控关系。管治以针对身体的戒律为手段,以具有连续细密监视特征的全景敞视主义为基本原则,对监狱、学校、医院、工厂和军营等中的各式人群都实施了注重细节的“政治解剖”,造就驯服的个体,谋求国家的强盛。然而,18世纪的重农主义却对管治实践及其权力机制的运作提出了质疑和批评;随之崛起的自由主义这一新的治理技艺把人口视为政治生活的核心,对国家功能作了重新定位。其实,无论是身体的管治.还是人口的管治。都必须解决同一个问题:国家干预和放任自由何者或两者之间的何种关系更能适应特定国家之特定时期的治理实践。
權力關繫的詳儘闡髮是福柯政治哲學的重要內容,管治作為17、18世紀西方治理技藝在權力關繫領域內運作所使用的主要政治技術之一,旨在維持國內秩序和增彊國力之間確立起可控關繫。管治以針對身體的戒律為手段,以具有連續細密鑑視特徵的全景敞視主義為基本原則,對鑑獄、學校、醫院、工廠和軍營等中的各式人群都實施瞭註重細節的“政治解剖”,造就馴服的箇體,謀求國傢的彊盛。然而,18世紀的重農主義卻對管治實踐及其權力機製的運作提齣瞭質疑和批評;隨之崛起的自由主義這一新的治理技藝把人口視為政治生活的覈心,對國傢功能作瞭重新定位。其實,無論是身體的管治.還是人口的管治。都必鬚解決同一箇問題:國傢榦預和放任自由何者或兩者之間的何種關繫更能適應特定國傢之特定時期的治理實踐。
권력관계적상진천발시복가정치철학적중요내용,관치작위17、18세기서방치리기예재권력관계영역내운작소사용적주요정치기술지일,지재유지국내질서화증강국력지간학립기가공관계。관치이침대신체적계률위수단,이구유련속세밀감시특정적전경창시주의위기본원칙,대감옥、학교、의원、공엄화군영등중적각식인군도실시료주중세절적“정치해부”,조취순복적개체,모구국가적강성。연이,18세기적중농주의각대관치실천급기권력궤제적운작제출료질의화비평;수지굴기적자유주의저일신적치리기예파인구시위정치생활적핵심,대국가공능작료중신정위。기실,무론시신체적관치.환시인구적관치。도필수해결동일개문제:국가간예화방임자유하자혹량자지간적하충관계경능괄응특정국가지특정시기적치리실천。
A full exposition of power relations constitutes the important contents of Michel Foucault's philosophy of politics. Police, as one of the main political technologies used by western techniques of government in the 17th ,18th century in the field of power relations, using disciplines focusing on people's bodies as means and taking panoptism characterized by continuity and detail as basic principle, performs"a political anatomy"emphasizing details on various multitudes in prison, school, hospital, workshop and barracks, training the docile individuals and seeking the coun- try's powerfulness and prosperousness. However, the physiocraey in the 18th century questions and criticizes the practice of police and its exercise of power mechanisms;the liberalism rising with it, this new technique of govern- ment, regards population as the core of political life, relocating the function of country. In fact, the police whether aiming at body or population must resolve the same problem: state's intervention and laissez faire, which and which kind of relation can be more suitable to the given country's practice of government in the given times.