法学研究
法學研究
법학연구
Cass Journal of Law
2011年
4期
3~20
,共null页
法院改革 审判运行机制 审判管理 审判职权配置
法院改革 審判運行機製 審判管理 審判職權配置
법원개혁 심판운행궤제 심판관리 심판직권배치
court reform, operative mechanism of adjudication, administration of adjudication, allocation of trial powers
法院如何恰当配置内部各主体、各层级的职权,合理确定各主体、各层级在审判活动中的地位和作用,建立符合审判客观规律和现实条件的审判运行机制,是我国人民法院改革与发展中的重大现实任务。C市人民法院在审判职权的配置与界定、审判流程的建立与控制、审判动态的监督与把控、审判绩效的评价和考核、信息技术的植入和运用等五个方面的探索,正逐步接近其构建“权力关系清晰、主体职责明确、监督制约到位、资源配置优化、审判活动透明、内部流程顺畅、指标导向合理、科技全面支撑”的法院内部审判运行机制之目标。鉴于构建法院审判运行机制在中国特色司法制度微观基础的塑造、我国法院规范化发展、法院改革创新等方面的意义,C市人民法院的实践能为其他司法机构的改革与发展提供有益的启示。
法院如何恰噹配置內部各主體、各層級的職權,閤理確定各主體、各層級在審判活動中的地位和作用,建立符閤審判客觀規律和現實條件的審判運行機製,是我國人民法院改革與髮展中的重大現實任務。C市人民法院在審判職權的配置與界定、審判流程的建立與控製、審判動態的鑑督與把控、審判績效的評價和攷覈、信息技術的植入和運用等五箇方麵的探索,正逐步接近其構建“權力關繫清晰、主體職責明確、鑑督製約到位、資源配置優化、審判活動透明、內部流程順暢、指標導嚮閤理、科技全麵支撐”的法院內部審判運行機製之目標。鑒于構建法院審判運行機製在中國特色司法製度微觀基礎的塑造、我國法院規範化髮展、法院改革創新等方麵的意義,C市人民法院的實踐能為其他司法機構的改革與髮展提供有益的啟示。
법원여하흡당배치내부각주체、각층급적직권,합리학정각주체、각층급재심판활동중적지위화작용,건립부합심판객관규률화현실조건적심판운행궤제,시아국인민법원개혁여발전중적중대현실임무。C시인민법원재심판직권적배치여계정、심판류정적건립여공제、심판동태적감독여파공、심판적효적평개화고핵、신식기술적식입화운용등오개방면적탐색,정축보접근기구건“권력관계청석、주체직책명학、감독제약도위、자원배치우화、심판활동투명、내부류정순창、지표도향합리、과기전면지탱”적법원내부심판운행궤제지목표。감우구건법원심판운행궤제재중국특색사법제도미관기출적소조、아국법원규범화발전、법원개혁창신등방면적의의,C시인민법원적실천능위기타사법궤구적개혁여발전제공유익적계시。
The compound case--decision mode of multi--subject and multi--hierarchy within the People's court has hindered the collective advantage of the court as the subject of adjudication in the reality of the trial activities. The most important contemporary task with regard to the Chinese court reform is concerned with the achievement of various goals such as the proper alloca- tion of powers to internal subjects and different hierarchies, the appropriate determination of the roles and functions of different subjects and hierarchies in the trial activities, and the establish- ment of the court adjudicative mechanism corresponding to the objective laws and requirements of adjudication and the present conditions of the courts. Explorations have been made by C Intermediate Court with regard to the allocation of pow- ers, the supervision of the adjudicative process, the supervision and guidance of the dynamic trial activities, the estimation and examination of the trial performance, and the introduction and exploitation of information technology. Such explorations aim at the establishment of the internal operative mechanism with the characteristics of "clear power allocation, determinate roles of different subjects, proper supervision and control, optimal resource allocation, transparent trial proceedings, effective internal process, rationally oriented guidelines and comprehensive techno- logical support". Due to the significance of the construction of the internal operative mechanism of adjudication to the micro--foundation of the judicial system with Chinese characteristics and the normalization and renovation of the court activities, the explorations and practice of C Intermedi- ate Court may provide beneficial implications in terms of the renovation and development of other judicial organs.