CAJ | 학술논문

近30年前出版的中国心理学史教材,舍人文主义而取科学主义的心理学研究范式,形成了两种研究模式。一种以科学主义心理学的概念体系作为挖掘与整合的主要框架,使得中国古代心理学史的研究停留在外在逻辑水平。另一种是潘菽教授言传身行的科学性原则。潘菽避开了科学主义心理学的研究困境,认为中国古代心理学思想是否具有科学性,应该检验其是否合乎人的心理实际,是否有助于破解当代心理学的问题与提高心理学的科学性。中国心理学史的改革必须坚持潘菽教授的科学性原则,以开放的学科视角,兼容科学与人文范式,并蓄各种研究方法,才能发展出体现中国文化内在逻辑原则的心理学体系。
근30년전출판적중국심이학사교재,사인문주의이취과학주의적심이학연구범식,형성료량충연구모식。일충이과학주의심이학적개념체계작위알굴여정합적주요광가,사득중국고대심이학사적연구정류재외재라집수평。령일충시반숙교수언전신행적과학성원칙。반숙피개료과학주의심이학적연구곤경,인위중국고대심이학사상시부구유과학성,응해검험기시부합호인적심리실제,시부유조우파해당대심이학적문제여제고심이학적과학성。중국심이학사적개혁필수견지반숙교수적과학성원칙,이개방적학과시각,겸용과학여인문범식,병축각충연구방법,재능발전출체현중국문화내재라집원칙적심이학체계。
In making the historical account of Chinese psychology in the textbook published nearly three decades ago,the compilers adopted the scientific paradigm at the expense of the humanistic paradigm,giving rise to two ways of making historical studies on the development of Chinese psychology.One is to use the theoretical system of scientific psychology as the major framework to make historical investigations,thus excluding the ancient Chinese psychological studies from the logical studies on psychology;the other is the way advocated by Professor Pan Shu,who saw through the difficulties of the scientific paradigm of psychological studies by arguing that the criteria for judging the contribution of ancient Chinese psychology should depend on whether it is in line with the facts of human psychological activities and whether it can help solve the problems we are facing today and thus enhance the scientific studies on human psychology.The innovations in the studies on the history of Chinese psychology should stick to the principle advanced by Professor Pan.Only when we combine the advantages of humanistic and scientific paradigms can we establish a theoretical system of psychology characterized by the inner logic of Chinese culture.