CAJ | 학술논문

本文应用Oliver和Holzinger关于政治战略的分析框架,在整合企业战略制度观和资源观（特别是动态能力视角）的基础上,解释了国有企业和民营企业的政治战略选择模式和机理,论证了规模和制度转型的权变效应,并发展了一系列命题。具体而言（：1）规模越大,国有企业选择前瞻型政治战略的倾向增加,选择防卫型政治战略的倾向降低;而民营企业选择预期型和前瞻型政治战略的倾向增加,选择反应型政治战略的倾向降低。（2）制度转型程度越大,国有企业选择反应型和防卫型政治战略的倾向增加,选择前瞻型政治战略的倾向降低;民营企业选择预期型政治战略的倾向增加,选择反应型政治战略的倾向降低。本研究是构建国有企业和民营企业政治战略选择模型的首次尝试,揭示了转型经济背景下企业政治战略选择的独特性,不仅拓展了企业战略制度观的应用领域,更重要的是探讨了企业战略制度观中一个重要但研究不足的议题——企业如何适应制度变革和规制转移。在政策意义方面,本研究指出,制度转型和企业规模对国有企业和民营企业的影响分别具有相互抵消和加强的效应,因而政策制定者需要同时考虑微观层次的企业改革和宏观层次的政策变革。
본문응용Oliver화Holzinger관우정치전략적분석광가,재정합기업전략제도관화자원관（특별시동태능력시각）적기출상,해석료국유기업화민영기업적정치전략선택모식화궤리,론증료규모화제도전형적권변효응,병발전료일계렬명제。구체이언（：1）규모월대,국유기업선택전첨형정치전략적경향증가,선택방위형정치전략적경향강저;이민영기업선택예기형화전첨형정치전략적경향증가,선택반응형정치전략적경향강저。（2）제도전형정도월대,국유기업선택반응형화방위형정치전략적경향증가,선택전첨형정치전략적경향강저;민영기업선택예기형정치전략적경향증가,선택반응형정치전략적경향강저。본연구시구건국유기업화민영기업정치전략선택모형적수차상시,게시료전형경제배경하기업정치전략선택적독특성,불부탁전료기업전략제도관적응용영역,경중요적시탐토료기업전략제도관중일개중요단연구불족적의제——기업여하괄응제도변혁화규제전이。재정책의의방면,본연구지출,제도전형화기업규모대국유기업화민영기업적영향분별구유상호저소화가강적효응,인이정책제정자수요동시고필미관층차적기업개혁화굉관층차적정책변혁。
It is very critical for a firm to consider political strategy as a part of its overall strategy in order to build competitive advantage,especially in the context of transition economy.Applying Oliver and Holzinger’s（2008） analytical framework on political strategies,This article illustrates a political strategies pattern of SOEs and POEs and explores the mechanisms through which SOEs and POEs choose these strategies,by integrating institution-based view and resource-based view（especially dynamic capabilities view） of business strategy.Moreover,the contingence effect of size and institutional transition is documented,and a set of propositions are developed.Specifically,1） larger SOEs are more likely to choose proactive strategy and less likely to choose defensive strategy,while larger POEs are more likely to choose proactive and anticipatory strategy and less likely to choose reactive strategy,2） the SOEs,which operate in an institutional environment characterized by more market orientation,are more likely to choose reactive and defensive strategy and less likely to choose proactive strategy,in contrast,the POEs,which operate in an institutional environment characterized by more market orientation,are more likely to choose anticipatory strategy and less likely to choose reactive strategy.This study pres-ents a first attempt to build a model of political strategy choice for SOEs and POEs.By exploring the uniqueness of corporate political strategy choice in the context of transition economy,we not only ex-tend the domain of institution-based view of business strategy,but more importantly,address an understudied issue of this institution-based view,namely,how a firm adapts to institutional change and regulation shift.Regarding policy implications,in this case,firm size and institutional transition have both offsetting and enforcing effect on SOEs and POEs’ strategy choice.Therefore,policy makers need to bear in mind changes at firm as well as policy level.