CAJ | 학술논문

随着新管理主义成为全球高等教育改革的核心话语，中国高校推行的教师聘任制改革对学术工作产生了不容忽视的影响。问卷调查和文本分析发现，在这一背景下，教师的学术工作在不同的机构、学科和职位之间出现了多重的分层与分割。结合学术工作相关的理论和研究，特别是博耶的学术观来看，这种分层与分割只重视“发现的学术”，“教学与应用的学术”被边缘化，“整合的学术”也有待进一步发展。这种结构不利于学术工作的相互促进和协调统一。这一现象背后的原因在于，政府、市场和学术精荚三者对学术工作不同方面的牵制力量强弱不均。纵向研究和论文专著的发表成为政府的关注对象，而横向研究则主要受到市场的影响，教学工作更多地受到学术精荚的制约。因此，建立完善统一的学术观井在相应的制度建设中予以保障，是中国高等教育发展的当务之急。
수착신관리주의성위전구고등교육개혁적핵심화어，중국고교추행적교사빙임제개혁대학술공작산생료불용홀시적영향。문권조사화문본분석발현，재저일배경하，교사적학술공작재불동적궤구、학과화직위지간출현료다중적분층여분할。결합학술공작상관적이론화연구，특별시박야적학술관래간，저충분층여분할지중시“발현적학술”，“교학여응용적학술”피변연화，“정합적학술”야유대진일보발전。저충결구불리우학술공작적상호촉진화협조통일。저일현상배후적원인재우，정부、시장화학술정협삼자대학술공작불동방면적견제역량강약불균。종향연구화논문전저적발표성위정부적관주대상，이횡향연구칙주요수도시장적영향，교학공작경다지수도학술정협적제약。인차，건립완선통일적학술관정재상응적제도건설중여이보장，시중국고등교육발전적당무지급。
With the rise of new managerialism, higher education institutions in the Ghl- nese Mainland have initiated important reform in the faculty employment system. Such sys- temic change has affected academic work profoundly. Based on the findings of a questionnaire survey and an analysis of relevant policy documents, this paper argues that academic work in China has been stratified among different institution, discipline and academic status, thus causing considerable segmentation. Taking reference of an ongoing international discussion on academic work, especially Boyer＇ s four types of scholarship, the paper concludes that stratification and segmentation of academic work in the Chinese Mainland have favored thescholarship of discovery while scholarship of teaching and application have been marginal- ized. Scholarship of integration remains an area in need of further development. Within such a structure, academic work is in need of balance and cohesiveness. Problems of the present structure can be attributed to competing demands on academic work as articulated by the state, the market and the academic oligarchy. Each party has its own interests to be served by the academics： basic/theoretical research projects, scholarly journal publications and monographs are emphasized by the state; involvement in the applied research projects is driv- en by the market, and teaching activities on campus are bounded to the academic oligarchy. Therefore, it is essential to construct a relative integrate academic view and related support- ive institutions for the development of China＇s higher education.