河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2011年
10期
150~155
,共null页
公共利益 民行检察 公益诉讼 耦合性
公共利益 民行檢察 公益訴訟 耦閤性
공공이익 민행검찰 공익소송 우합성
public interests ; civil-administrative prosecution ; public interest litigation ; coupling
公益诉讼理论为维护公共利益提供了一种新模式，需要在既有制度体系中寻求合理衔接和耦合。民行检察制度作为检察监督权的表现形式，具有维护公益的制度功能。公益诉讼和民行检察在价值目标、案件性质、案件范围、启动方式、司法规制上具有内在的藕合性，这种藕合性分析有可能为两种制度的完善和实践提供新的视角。
公益訴訟理論為維護公共利益提供瞭一種新模式，需要在既有製度體繫中尋求閤理銜接和耦閤。民行檢察製度作為檢察鑑督權的錶現形式，具有維護公益的製度功能。公益訴訟和民行檢察在價值目標、案件性質、案件範圍、啟動方式、司法規製上具有內在的藕閤性，這種藕閤性分析有可能為兩種製度的完善和實踐提供新的視角。
공익소송이론위유호공공이익제공료일충신모식，수요재기유제도체계중심구합리함접화우합。민행검찰제도작위검찰감독권적표현형식，구유유호공익적제도공능。공익소송화민행검찰재개치목표、안건성질、안건범위、계동방식、사법규제상구유내재적우합성，저충우합성분석유가능위량충제도적완선화실천제공신적시각。
Public interest ligation provides a new mode for ihe protection of public interest, it needs to seek rational joining and coupling among existing institutional systems. As a representation of proseeutorial power, civil-admlnistratlve prosecution possesses institutional function of protecting pubhc interests. Public interest litigation and civil-adminlstrative prosecution are inherently coupled among the pursuing of values, nature of cases, scope of cases, ways of startup and judicial regulations, the analysis of these aspects may provide a new perspective to the perfect and practical of two institutions.
