CAJ | 학술논문

数学易缪性是对传统数学真理观的挑战。皮尔士和拉卡托斯虽然都提出了数学的易缪性，但二者对于数学易缪性的理解并不一致。文章从三个方面即数学易缪性的提出、数学易缪性的根据和对数学易缪性的信心介绍了皮尔士和拉卡托斯的数学易缪性，在此基础上对二者的数学易缪性进行了比较。
수학역무성시대전통수학진리관적도전。피이사화랍잡탁사수연도제출료수학적역무성，단이자대우수학역무성적리해병불일치。문장종삼개방면즉수학역무성적제출、수학역무성적근거화대수학역무성적신심개소료피이사화랍잡탁사적수학역무성，재차기출상대이자적수학역무성진행료비교。
The mathematics fallibilism is a challenge to the views of the traditional mathematics truths. Although both Charles Sanders Peirce and Imre Lakatos put forward the mathematics fallibilism, their understandings to the mathematics fallibilism were different. This paper introduces Peirce and Lakatos＇ mathematics fallibilism from three aspects which are the mathematics fallibilism＇ s presenting, its justification, and the confidence to it. In the end, their views on mathematics fallibilism are compared.