CAJ | 학술논문

当前被害人过错在审判实践中不是大小的评价问题而是有无的认定问题,该问题恰又是决定被害人过错这一酌定量刑情节规范适用的前提。审判实践表明,并不是所有被害人与犯罪人互动的行为都能认定为一种过错行为,至少被害人的适当行为、尚需证实行为和违法行为都应排除在被害人过错认定的藩篱之外。认定被害人行为是一种过错行为必须满足两个要件：一是被害人对危害结果施加了原因力,即被害人过错与危害结果之间具有因果关系;二是被害人行为逾越了社会相当性所能容许的范围,即被害人过错是一种侵害社会伦理秩序的行为。
당전피해인과착재심판실천중불시대소적평개문제이시유무적인정문제,해문제흡우시결정피해인과착저일작정양형정절규범괄용적전제。심판실천표명,병불시소유피해인여범죄인호동적행위도능인정위일충과착행위,지소피해인적괄당행위、상수증실행위화위법행위도응배제재피해인과착인정적번리지외。인정피해인행위시일충과착행위필수만족량개요건：일시피해인대위해결과시가료원인력,즉피해인과착여위해결과지간구유인과관계;이시피해인행위유월료사회상당성소능용허적범위,즉피해인과착시일충침해사회윤리질서적행위。
Victim＇ s fault doesn＇ t estimate big or small question, but it has it or not judging one in judicial practice. This question has a premise that decides to judge victim＇ s fault which is the considerable circumstance. Judicial practice shows that not all interacting actions between victim and offender are a fault. They should not include victim＇ s fit action, suspicious one and unlawful one. Judging victim＇ s fault is on the basis of two ways ： first there is causal relationship between victim＇ s fault and harm, second victim＇ s action break through social appropriation. In other words, victim＇ s fault violates ethical order.