CAJ | 학술논문

由于应对反倾销的公共物品属性，单个企业从个体理性的角度出发却导致对每个个体次优选择的结果，陷入“公地悲剧”，不符合集体理性。文章通过博弈分析得出作为非营利性的、增进同业利益的行业协会参与治理企业出口定价和在遭遇国外反倾销指控的条件下，协调涉案企业应诉和分摊应诉费用对提高中国企业应对反倾销的成效有着非常重要的意义，然后通过收集数据实证分析行业协会参与治理可以大大提高中国企业应对反倾销的积极性，在此基础上对中国行业协会改革提出建议。
유우응대반경소적공공물품속성，단개기업종개체이성적각도출발각도치대매개개체차우선택적결과，함입“공지비극”，불부합집체이성。문장통과박혁분석득출작위비영리성적、증진동업이익적행업협회삼여치리기업출구정개화재조우국외반경소지공적조건하，협조섭안기업응소화분탄응소비용대제고중국기업응대반경소적성효유착비상중요적의의，연후통과수집수거실증분석행업협회삼여치리가이대대제고중국기업응대반경소적적겁성，재차기출상대중국행업협회개혁제출건의。
Because dealing with the anti - dumping belongs to a kind of public goods, the fact that a single firm deals with anti -dumping from the individual rationality has led to the sub -optimal result, and they are trapped into the tragedy of the commons, which does not meet the collective rationality. By the game analysis, we get the conclusion that in China the trade association as a non - profit organization promotes the trades＇ interests par- ticipates in the governance of export pricing , helps our firms deal with the foreign anti - dumping charges and shares the litigation costs, which can help them improve the effectiveness of dealing with anti -dumping, then by empirical analysis we prove the conclusion, on this basis, the opinions are proposed.