CAJ | 학술논문

本文从分析明治时代“恋爱”一词的词源学角度入手，在解读夏目漱石和村上春树的相关文本基础上，指出两位作者由于时代背景的差异，对性描写的处理有所不同：前者还处于探索将“性”和“爱”结合起来的。近代恋爱”的过程中；而后者描写的是在高度资本主义发达时期，人们无法将“性”和“爱”完满结合的虚幻感。但两者根本的相同点在于无法将女性的性欲和男性的性欲同等看待，将“胜”和“爱”相分离。而这一点深刻体现了两位作者共同的“女性蔑视”倾向。
본문종분석명치시대“연애”일사적사원학각도입수，재해독하목수석화촌상춘수적상관문본기출상，지출량위작자유우시대배경적차이，대성묘사적처리유소불동：전자환처우탐색장“성”화“애”결합기래적。근대연애”적과정중；이후자묘사적시재고도자본주의발체시기，인문무법장“성”화“애”완만결합적허환감。단량자근본적상동점재우무법장녀성적성욕화남성적성욕동등간대，장“성”화“애”상분리。이저일점심각체현료량위작자공동적“녀성멸시”경향。
By analyzing the etymology of the word ＂love＂, the paper points out the differences between Natsume Soseki and Haruki Murakami in their description of love story： the former was still in the process of exploring the modern conception of ＂love＂, while the latter focused on the sense of nothingness about ＂ love＂ in highly developed capitalist period. However, the fundamental similarity between them is that they can＇t treat the sexuality of males and females equally, which reflects the same ＂misogynistic＂ tendency in the works of the two authors.