CAJ | 학술논문

随着20世纪新兴科学技术尤其是机械复制技术不断渗入艺术领域，艺术的生产和接受都呈现出了新的形式和特征。对于这一转型所引起的艺术功能的变化，阿多诺从文化工业的意识形态理论出发，指出机械复制艺术完全为资本逻辑所控制，其功能也随之由原来的独立批判沦落为资本主义的欺骗与整合；本雅明则敏锐地捕捉了机械复制技术所蕴含的革命性与创造性，期望通过“艺术的政治化”来实现新型艺术的颠覆功能。阿多诺与本雅明的观点针锋相对，但理论宗旨和命运又可谓殊途同归。两人的理论交锋奠定了其后西方马克思主义文化研究的视域与平台，同时也揭示了马克思主义的革命和解放理论所面临的理论困境和现实挑战。
수착20세기신흥과학기술우기시궤계복제기술불단삼입예술영역，예술적생산화접수도정현출료신적형식화특정。대우저일전형소인기적예술공능적변화，아다낙종문화공업적의식형태이론출발，지출궤계복제예술완전위자본라집소공제，기공능야수지유원래적독립비판륜락위자본주의적기편여정합；본아명칙민예지포착료궤계복제기술소온함적혁명성여창조성，기망통과“예술적정치화”래실현신형예술적전복공능。아다낙여본아명적관점침봉상대，단이론종지화명운우가위수도동귀。량인적이론교봉전정료기후서방마극사주의문화연구적시역여평태，동시야게시료마극사주의적혁명화해방이론소면림적이론곤경화현실도전。
With the application of newly-emerged technology in 20＇h century, esp. the skill of mechanical reproduction to art field, artistic production and acceptance began to show new forms and features. As the transformation has changed the function of art, Adorno pointed out that the art of mechanical reproduction has been completely controlled by capital logic and its original independent function of criticism reduced to capital deceiving and integration, while Benjamin seized keenly the feature of being ＂revolutionary and cre- ative＂ which the skill contains. He expected to realize the subversive function of the new art form through ＂art politicizing＂. Though they opposed strongly to each other, Adorno and Benjamin carried the same goal in theoretical exploration and faced same destiny at the end. Their debate laid foundation for the latter study of Marxist cultures in the West and discovered the theoretical difficulties and practical challenges that theory of Marxism about revolution and emancipation has to face.