CAJ | 학술논문

＂得到辩护的真信念＂是西方哲学从纯粹的认知兴趣出发得出的关于知识的一贯定义,从这一定义出发,命题信念和客体信念根本不同。在西方知识论视域中对比考察儒家、道家和墨家述＂知＂的句法及其基本理论特点,我们可以得出结论：尽管先秦时期不乏纯粹的认知旨趣和句法等形式逻辑上的追求,但关于知的论述都以伦理诉求为旨归,从而缺乏西方文化传统中相应的成熟的认知理论以及形式逻辑体系。
＂득도변호적진신념＂시서방철학종순수적인지흥취출발득출적관우지식적일관정의,종저일정의출발,명제신념화객체신념근본불동。재서방지식론시역중대비고찰유가、도가화묵가술＂지＂적구법급기기본이론특점,아문가이득출결론：진관선진시기불핍순수적인지지취화구법등형식라집상적추구,단관우지적논술도이윤리소구위지귀,종이결핍서방문화전통중상응적성숙적인지이론이급형식라집체계。
＂Justified true belief＂ has been the definition of knowledge in western philosophy from the perspective of pure interest in cognition.It follows that a propositional belief is fundamentally different from an objective belief.Against the background of western epistemology,the syntax used by and the theoretical features of Confucianists,Taoists and Mohists on the issue of ＂knowledge＂ are compared and contrasted and the conclusion is： although there were some scholars interested in the pursuit of pure knowledge and formal logic such as syntax in the pre-Qin period,most theorization about knowledge was based on ethics and fell short of the rigor and maturity of epistemology and formal logic in the tradition of western culture.