CAJ | 학술논문

维特根斯坦的语法分析是要通过分析语言的形而上学用法消解哲学问题，让语言回归到日常使用中。从语法分析的独特视角出发，可以看到他所假想的遵守规则悖论就是一种脱离日常语言游戏的哲学问题，一种形而上学的虚构，是由于受表层语法的诱惑对语言进行错误使用的结果，因此这种悖论是需要被消解掉的。从更深层的一种意义上说，这种蛊惑的并没有完全脱离我们的生活形式，被用来解说规则的语言虽然武断，但永远无法跳出我们的生活形式和习惯的制约和建构。这个悖论在某种意义上蕴涵了语言所展开的生活形式的可能性。
유특근사탄적어법분석시요통과분석어언적형이상학용법소해철학문제，양어언회귀도일상사용중。종어법분석적독특시각출발，가이간도타소가상적준수규칙패론취시일충탈리일상어언유희적철학문제，일충형이상학적허구，시유우수표층어법적유혹대어언진행착오사용적결과，인차저충패론시수요피소해도적。종경심층적일충의의상설，저충고혹적병몰유완전탈리아문적생활형식，피용래해설규칙적어언수연무단，단영원무법도출아문적생활형식화습관적제약화건구。저개패론재모충의의상온함료어언소전개적생활형식적가능성。
The aim of Wittgenstein＇s grammar analysis is to bring language back into daily use through the grammatical analysis of the metaphysical use of language which leads to the resolution of physical problem. From the unique angle of grammatical analysis, one can find that the hypothetical paradox of rule-following is a kind of philosophical problem detaching from daily linguistic games, a kind of metaphysical fabrication that are resulted from the erroneous linguistic use misled by surface grammar, which needs to be resolved. And from a deeper sense, the misleading of surface grammar has not lost its contact with our form of life. The language interpreting those rules might be dogmatic, but it can never be freed from the restraint and the construction of our form of life and customs. In a certain sense, Wittgenstein＇s rule-following paradox entails all the possible forms of life that cart be showed by language.