CAJ | 학술논문

道德判断是人类日常生活中必不可少的评价性活动之一，但道德判断中情与理的作用争执不休。从休谟和康德的哲学论争到发展心理学家对道德推理的关注，直至现代社会心理学家对情绪的重新审视，道德判断的决策机制已经演变为多种模型相互竞争的局面。在回顾和分析道德判断各种理论的基础上，阐述了情绪和推理在道德判断中的作用，认为今后应当更多地关注道德推理的实际作用，并当运用更为先进的操纵手段，同时注重情境的影响来考察道德判断中情与理的问题。
도덕판단시인류일상생활중필불가소적평개성활동지일，단도덕판단중정여리적작용쟁집불휴。종휴모화강덕적철학논쟁도발전심이학가대도덕추리적관주，직지현대사회심이학가대정서적중신심시，도덕판단적결책궤제이경연변위다충모형상호경쟁적국면。재회고화분석도덕판단각충이론적기출상，천술료정서화추리재도덕판단중적작용，인위금후응당경다지관주도덕추리적실제작용，병당운용경위선진적조종수단，동시주중정경적영향래고찰도덕판단중정여리적문제。
Though moral judgment ranks among one of the most essential human activities, arguments about the roles of emotion and reasoning play in moral judgment never cease. From the philosophical controversy between Hume and Kant to the debates among developmental psychologists; from social psychology arguments about the power of the situations to neuroscience insights about the brain constraints to human morality, modern psychology has witnessed the paradigm shifts from time to time concerning the importance of emotion and reasoning in moral judgments. We reviewed several competing theories on moral judgment and gave a synthetic view of the roles emotion and reasoning play in moral judgment. We suggest that the psychological contributions in understanding human morality would come from the systematical analysis of moral judgments in real life situations involving real individuals with real implications. Methodologically, multi-level and multi-method analysis is much needed. By studying the effects of situational factors in moral judgments, we may eventually be able to go beyond the dichotomy of emotion and reasoning to truly understand the mechanisms involved in human moral judgments.