重庆邮电大学学报:社会科学版
重慶郵電大學學報:社會科學版
중경유전대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications:Social Science Edition
2011年
6期
131~134
,共null页
多元智能理论 研究生 综合素质 评价体系
多元智能理論 研究生 綜閤素質 評價體繫
다원지능이론 연구생 종합소질 평개체계
multiple intelligences; postgraduates; comprehensive quality; system of assessment
科学有效的研究生教育必然需要有一套成熟规范的评价体系与之相配套,科学合理的评价体系是研究生培养质量的可靠保障。我国的研究生教育评价体系尚处于初创建构阶段,还不够成熟,突出表现在对研究生综合素质认识还不够深入、对研究生综合素质评价功能定位过于功利化和评价标准过于单一化等方面。多元智能理论视域下智能多元性、社会性、发展性等特点促使人们提升对研究生综合素质的认识。多元智能理论视域下我国研究生综合素质评价体系首要目标是提供因材施教的依据,促进个体多元发展;核心价值应体现考核评价的社会价值;内容应当重视通识教育和艺术教育评价;评价主体应当多元化,方式应当多样化,评价过程应当动态化。
科學有效的研究生教育必然需要有一套成熟規範的評價體繫與之相配套,科學閤理的評價體繫是研究生培養質量的可靠保障。我國的研究生教育評價體繫尚處于初創建構階段,還不夠成熟,突齣錶現在對研究生綜閤素質認識還不夠深入、對研究生綜閤素質評價功能定位過于功利化和評價標準過于單一化等方麵。多元智能理論視域下智能多元性、社會性、髮展性等特點促使人們提升對研究生綜閤素質的認識。多元智能理論視域下我國研究生綜閤素質評價體繫首要目標是提供因材施教的依據,促進箇體多元髮展;覈心價值應體現攷覈評價的社會價值;內容應噹重視通識教育和藝術教育評價;評價主體應噹多元化,方式應噹多樣化,評價過程應噹動態化。
과학유효적연구생교육필연수요유일투성숙규범적평개체계여지상배투,과학합리적평개체계시연구생배양질량적가고보장。아국적연구생교육평개체계상처우초창건구계단,환불구성숙,돌출표현재대연구생종합소질인식환불구심입、대연구생종합소질평개공능정위과우공리화화평개표준과우단일화등방면。다원지능이론시역하지능다원성、사회성、발전성등특점촉사인문제승대연구생종합소질적인식。다원지능이론시역하아국연구생종합소질평개체계수요목표시제공인재시교적의거,촉진개체다원발전;핵심개치응체현고핵평개적사회개치;내용응당중시통식교육화예술교육평개;평개주체응당다원화,방식응당다양화,평개과정응당동태화。
A scientific and effective postgraduate education will inevitably need a mature and standardized system of assessment for supporting;a scientific assessing system is a reliable guarantee for the quality of postgraduate edu- cation. The system of graduate educational assessment in China is still in start-up phase of construction and not mature enough, the main reason for which is, among others, the cognition of the comprehensive quality of the postgraduates is not thorough enough, the function of the comprehensive quality assessment of postgraduates is too utility-oriented, and the evaluative criteria is oversimplified. Under the Perspective of Multiple Intelligences, the human intelligence is multiple, social and evolutionary. The primary objective of the scientific and open system of graduate educational assessment is to provide the theoretical basis for teaching students in accordance with their aptitude; the core value should reflect the social value;the content should place emphasis on assessment of general education and art education; the evaluative subject should be pluralistic, the approach should be varied, and the process should be dynamic.